- Joined
- Jan 20, 2002
- Messages
- 35,858
- Reaction score
- 30,623
I know a lot more than you
You think a film, for example, with box office returns of 150m against a budget of 100m would equal a box office success.
You really don’t, snowflake.
I know a lot more than you
You think a film, for example, with box office returns of 150m against a budget of 100m would equal a box office success.
You really don’t, snowflake.
Well, it seems like your question has been answered. They digitally manipulated the tone/look of the film and may have been one of the first to do it. I don't know enough about the history to know if it was definitely the first film to do so or not.It was shot on film
Well, it seems like your question has been answered. They digitally manipulated the tone/look of the film and may have been one of the first to do it. I don't know enough about the history to know if it was definitely the first film to do so or not.
As far as the Coen Bros shooting digitally, I must've got confused between O Brother and No Country For Old Men. I'm pretty sure they filmed that on a RED... but I could still be wrong.
All I know is that they're both fuckin incredible films and one of the major reasons why the Coen Bros are some of my favourite filmmakers of all time.
Fuck. I think that I'm getting it confused with them doing some sort of digital post production work, similar to O Brother. In fact, now that I think about it more, I think that's what it is. Something to do with digital editing suites and post production. I distinctly remember watching some video with them talking about the advantages of the new digital editing and colour grading software.Nah dude, No Country was film
The first and only thing so far they shot digital was Buster Scruggs
I dunno but it’s a great film either way. Very underrated imo
lol at the people that gave you shit replies they guessed up.
The novel thing about O Brother was it was entirely done with a digital intermediate, beginning to end. previous films only used it for portions.
For the theatrical run maybe.
But I guess they used DI's since 1997 on dvd's. Pretty sure they did full length DI's on the '97 Star Wars special editions too.
Jason X was 2001. The first film to be fully DI was low-budget Urbania in 2000 which I think was shot in 16mm to DI to 35 mm. I think Sorted was the first feature length 35 mm one in 2000 right before O Brother.Jason X was also scanned from film onto a digital intermediate for mastering around the same time ('99/2000), I don't think either were the first in general, just the first for theatrical releases or larger budget releases in general to have a digital master. This is also barring films shot digitally like The Last Broadcast (which was the first film to be filmed, edited, and screened/released into theaters entirely digitally).
It has a pretty good repuation and wouldnt call it underrated