- Joined
- Sep 22, 2021
- Messages
- 3,705
- Reaction score
- 6,352
Tony was unstoppable for years walking guys down never taking a step back and now you guys seem to forget how good he was
I don't think prime Tony beats those guys but he definitely atleast gives them a real fight.I still think prime Tony could drown Gaycheese,Dariush and Chuck
Tony was never the same after his horrific knee break.It's interesting because Tony has always had two glaring flaws in his game,
1 being his striking (mainly boxing) defense and
2 his TDD
That said, could it be that his recent opponents he's lost to (Justin, Charles, Dariush) are just guys who excel at those things (Justin with his hands, landed anything and everything on Tony and Charles ,Dariush took him down at will and dominated) were able to expose his weaknesses or is it truly a story of Tony just being washed/a shell of his former self??
I understand the macro point, but again, they don't age the same because they don't have as much wear and tear.That happened after Gaethje fight where he was passive and trying to avoid damage. But yes torn ligaments does require more healing/recovery time. But the point of my post isn't so much on age alone, because lots of examples of older fighters in even lighter weight classes having success, and still having success. I think it's more life style that makes the difference and the ones that live clean tend to be able to fight in the later years where most would need to retire. Also I think if may boil down to their training and motivation, some might just be going through the motions in the later years and fighting for paychecks. Donaire just won a world title in boxing at age 38 in a lighter weight class. PAC and Mayweather were still winning belts and beating young champions in their mid 30's - 40's. So I don't look at Tony and Nick as that old because I've seen older fighters in boxing have success in the lighter weight classes.
Both has wear and tear, boxing is much more taxing in other way in terms of conditioning/cardio. More damage from strikes in boxing since it's only strikes. You are arguing for joint pains and injuries but not everyone in mma is wrestling based. They tend to just use less wrestling as they get older. Who knows, maybe they just need to be more elastic and stretch more to ease their joints and mobility issues. Most people use stiff movements so it's not surprising their mobility becomes stiff as they get older. Fluid movement fighters tend to age better with their mobility/movement.I understand the macro point, but again, they don't age the same because they don't have as much wear and tear.
Remember that Tony tore his knee before fighting Pettis and many could argue that's where the recession of his dominance started. I know he tripped on a chord or whatever, but it's also years of wrestling and grappling that led to him having miles on his body. What you're saying is also true though he doesn't have a style that ages well.
I just find the boxers to be of no relevance due to the automaticity of their training. It's like comparing aging baseball players to NFL. The wear and tear is much worse in MMA with wrestling and Jiu-Jitsu on top of doing all the striking.
The bottom line is the average age at the lighter weight classes is very low. Tony is older than most, and has more miles.
Yeah no kidding! He took so much damage against Vennata, Lee, Pettis etc. and he won those fights.he pretty much survives on toughness, and that's a hard thing to sustain for long. especially as you get older, and slower - now you're not tough and competitive, you're just a punching bag.