Jesus dude it's really not that hard and you clearly haven't read my posts whatsoever.
Did you miss the part where I talked about how I was a highfunctioning ivyleague law candidate myself who busted his ass in college?
Law school is a borderline caste system. They literally differentiate schools based on Tier. If you're not in a T1 law school you get waaaaay less opportunities than those who are, which is why asshole tiger-parents like Chua fight so hard so their kids get into places like Harvard even if their LSAT score or logic games ability is equivalent with thousands of other students. Can you provide any sort of legal or academic achievement that Chua-Rubenfeld has that made her a distinguished member of her class? Law Review? Mock Trial? Any idea what those even are?
I'll try again:
She is fully qualified to learn law and become a good lawyer. The difference is that there are literally thousands upon thousands of people who are as much or more qualified from a pure proficiency standpoint, and yet Brett Kavanaugh picked the daughter of his friend and supporter. None of you have any fucking clue what you're talking about and have no idea what the legal profession is about, the hierarchy of law schools, or the amount of insane prestige and opportunity that comes with being given one of 36 SCOTUS clerkships. Here's an entire fucking podcast by a bunch of elite law professors at the American Bar Association discussing how aspiring law students can better themselves for even a chance at this shit:
http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/podcast_monthly_episode_31
Same podcast ....Hanna Stotland (went to Harvard undergrad and Harvard Law after being so poor growing up that she only had a GED, not $500,000 of NYC private schooling and two law professor parents):
Discussing how tons of Yale and Harvard kids still apply only to be rejected
So once again: even at Harvard or Yale you need to be a legal stud to get these jobs. If you aren't at on of the Top 14 or so schools you basically have to be the best student in your entire class to even consider applying.
Just imagine if this was an affirmative action debate and I was giving out SCOTUS clerkships to a bunch of black and mexican lawyers from random law schools? Everyone would be pointing out how the top law students were being passed over, despite the fact the Mexican and Black lawyers had the baseline skills to fulfill the duties. If I went "well prove to me they can't do the job" you'd go "well there are obviously more qualified candidates who deserved it!", but now that it's the spoiled child friend of your SCOTUS god kavanaugh you want to praise some random privileged child for legal skills you know nothing about.
Here is a legal blog in 2018 predicting that Kavanaugh was all but certainly going to hire Chuas daughter in the future for a clerkship if nominated:
https://abovethelaw.com/2018/07/yal...s-extraordinary-ability-to-hire-her-daughter/
To which the daughter replied that she definitely was going to do military JAG service and would never consider a SCOTUS clerkship
So yeah, feel free to show me something that demonstrates why this chick is worth arguing for unless you're a complete hack in love with Brett Kavanaugh. My guess is you'll come back with one...maaaybe two completely opened-ended comments saying "you're wrong" and then carry on to your next cocksure conversation.