Law KyrieAnna Liles back in Court tomo. #FreeKiwi

Joshuaace

27X World Geezer Belt Champion
@red
Joined
Oct 6, 2009
Messages
8,867
Reaction score
9,009
Back on November 20th Ms. Liles was arrested and charged with Attempted Murder after she fled from a police interaction under a hail of gunfire from 2 Officers. They fired 10 shots at the side and mostly rear of her vehicle as she drove off. Those charges were downgraded to Assult GBI/policeman. The Sacremento Sheriff's Department posted a "Critical Incident Briefing" in late December. I've been fascinated by the case since watching that brief a week later. On February 6th, Civil Rights Attorney Mark Merin filed a $1M plus on KyrieAnna's behalf.

https://dockets.justia.com/docket/california/caedce/2:2024cv00416/441170

Merin names the following Defendants "County of Sacramento, Sacramento County Sheriff's Department, Jim Cooper, City of Rancho Cordova, Rancho Cordova Police Department, Matthew Tamayo, Matthew Bollinger, Spencer Hettema and John Higley." In part, the suit alleges that the press releas by the Sacremento Sheriff's office is misleading and bias. Here is that brief released to YT by SacSheriff. To me, the narrative painted by the brief is that KyrieAnna's is an unstable, weaponized, threat to the community, and that justifies the actions of the Officers who shot at her. That's my take....if you guys think it paints a different picture, please share.



This is the mildly edited body worn cam footage from the Officer in training. It is continuous from before their arrival on scene, until after they have fired their weapons, attempted pursuit, and returned to perform another unlawful Terry stop, frisk, and further unlawful detention for the purpose of forcing them to give witness statements. Statements about a shooting perpetuated by these same 2 cops. Knock it the F off guys, you know what the hell happened, it was you guys pulling the trigger. Video is time stamped just before 2nd illegal Terry stop these Officers performed and escalated in a 6-7 minute span. It's a long video, cliffs below it.



1:25 Officers make contact with 911 callers. The Lady that claimed in the 911 call "that a woman was trying to break in to her house with a butcher knife" , backed away from that statement when interviewed in person. By the time Officers concluded interviewing these Reporting Persons, they concluded, "No trespassing, no 417, no crime".

11:30 Officers initiate consensual encouter with Ms. Liles.

11:40 Ms. Liles closes door, ending consensual encounter

11:41 Bollinger says FU to RAS and opens door to continue what has become an unlawful investigative detention.

12:20 Bollinger and Hettema say FU to Probable Cause and attempt to pull KyrieAnna from the vehicle without it.

12:30 Bollinger defies department policy and runs in to the path of the fleeing vehicle.

12:34 Bollinger fires his first shot at the side of Ms.Liles car. He has already removed himself from the vehicles path before he commences firing 7 rounds.

12:35 Hettema fires the first of his 3 rounds at the back of Ms. Liles. He can clearly see Bollinger is in no danger of being run over when he fires his first round. By his 3rd round, even Bollinger is looking at him as if to say "wtf?"


My understanding is Ms. Liles could agree to Mental Health Diversion as early as tommorow. I personally see that as a gross miscariage of justice. what you say Sherdog. Does the unlawful stop, frisk, and detention of the occupants of the Ford Explorer totally impeach the credibility of these 2 goons as witnesses? Do you think it's odd that there is a $1M Civil Suit, but Ms. Liles is still represented by the PD in Criminal Court? Personally, I think that's totally Bananas. And the knives seized from inside the house. Holy shit, what would justify a search of her home for those items? Is her defense innefective for not having filed a Pitchess Motion and a 995 Motion to Dismiss? For not petitioning for the removal of the bias Briefing that SacSheriff posted to YT?

Not sure about you guys. But a Government capable of excusing so many blatant policy violations by their own agents is far more threatening to me than an interaction with a knife wielding girl that makes it clear she has no harmful intentions.

btw, @kyrieannas_mawm is in fact, KyrieAnna's Mawm. She can't post in the WR because she does not have 500 posts, but I'm sure she will be looking in. With that in mind, please be respectful of the fact there are Ladies present.
 
5808630b1620c597dd22898ee274101c.gif


These sensational OPs are always such obvious bullshit.

Why did someone call the cops on her. What was she doing?
 
Why did someone call the cops on her. What was she doing?

The reporting person claimed that Ms. Liles was trying to break in to her house. She backed away from that statement when interviewed in person by the 2 cops. They made contact with that caller, interviewed her, and collectively concluded that no crime had occurred.

Ms. Liles claimed that someone had her dog, and had previously made death threats towards her dog.
 
Everyone involved is an idiot.

From this pov, the shots are ridiculous. Pulling the couple out of the Explorer is mind blowing. Thinking you have the right to stop, frisk, and detain someone because they are potential witnesses. That's an impressive level of stupid for a 6 yr vet. Filing the Pitchess and the 995 should have been reflex reaction after her PD watched the BWC......if they watched the BWC.

I don't see how a Judge could accept her in to mental health diversion if he watches BWC 1 or 2. It's clear she wasn't trying to assault those cops with the intent to cause gbi.
She was fleeing a false arrest with reasonable force, which she has the right to do.
 
From this pov, the shots are ridiculous. Pulling the couple out of the Explorer is mind blowing. Thinking you have the right to stop, frisk, and detain someone because they are potential witnesses. That's an impressive level of stupid for a 6 yr vet. Filing the Pitchess and the 995 should have been reflex reaction after her PD watched the BWC......if they watched the BWC.

I don't see how a Judge could accept her in to mental health diversion if he watches BWC 1 or 2. It's clear she wasn't trying to assault those cops with the intent to cause gbi.
She was fleeing a false arrest with reasonable force, which she has the right to do.
I agree with everything except the reasonable force comment.
 
Lol at "runs into the path of a fleeing vehicle". He was in the yard while she was reversing in the opposite direction, then she put it in drive and screeched through the yard directly at him. Yeah, that is attempting to run over a cop. There's an insane person running around someone's yard with a knife, suspected of being high based on the interview with the other people, then screeches through the yard trying to run over the cop. You don't get to decide to "end the consensual encounter" when the cops pull you over, and you certainly don't get to do it by slamming the car door and trying to run them over.

What's the best case scenario if a cop asks you to step out of the car and you push him off and screech away nearly hitting them? Is there even a .001% chance they say "well, that's that" and just let her go? She's lucky the shots missed and she didn't crash her car.
 
Last edited:
We're really not going to let her mom post in the War Room until she gets 500 posts?

<JagsKiddingMe>

Maybe an exception can be made considering the circumstances?
 
Lol at "runs into the path of a fleeing vehicle". He was in the yard while she was reversing in the opposite direction, then she put it in drive and screeched through the yard directly at him.

This from their policy:

C. Officers should, whenever possible, avoid assuming a position in the pathof a moving vehicle. A department member threatened by an oncomingmotor vehicle shall, where reasonable, consider moving out of thevehicle’s path to mitigate the threat.

Never mind A and B.

A. An Officer shall not fire at or from a moving vehicle unless there isreasonable assurance that such firing will not endanger innocent persons.

B. The use of firearms from, or against, moving motor vehicles is inherentlydangerous and often times ineffective.

There's an insane person running around someone's yard with a knife,

That insane person was searching for her missing pet. According to her, the dog's life has been threatened previously. She also has hate messages scrawled in to the side of her house. She weighs like a buck fifteen. Given those circumstances, I don't think it's crazy at all to have a knife while searching for the dog.

suspected of being high based on the interview with the other people, then screeches through the yard trying to run over the cop.

She wasn't suspected of any crime when the Officers initiated contact with her. Do you even know what RAS is? Because they said with their own mouths they didn't have it.

You don't get to decide to "end the consensual encounter" when the cops pull you over,

The hell you don't. I recommend you educate yourself on the 3 tiers of police/civilian encounters.

and you certainly don't get to do it by slamming the car door and trying to run them over.

You can resist a false arrest with reasonable force, and that's what she did. The cops didn't have Probale Cause to arrest her at the point they grabbed her arm. She isn't charged with any crime that occurred prior to that. You understand PC? They said they didn't have it, their words.

What's the best case scenario if a cop asks you to step out of the car and you push him off and screech away nearly hitting them? Is there even a .001% chance they say "well, that's that" and just let her go? She's lucky the shots missed and she didn't crash her car.

And you think that justifies any action that they may take against you? usernamedumbass....checks out.
 
Lol at "runs into the path of a fleeing vehicle". He was in the yard while she was reversing in the opposite direction, then she put it in drive and screeched through the yard directly at him. Yeah, that is attempting to run over a cop. There's an insane person running around someone's yard with a knife, suspected of being high based on the interview with the other people, then screeches through the yard trying to run over the cop. You don't get to decide to "end the consensual encounter" when the cops pull you over, and you certainly don't get to do it by slamming the car door and trying to run them over.

What's the best case scenario if a cop asks you to step out of the car and you push him off and screech away nearly hitting them? Is there even a .001% chance they say "well, that's that" and just let her go? She's lucky the shots missed and she didn't crash her car.

Yeah I didn't even bother to read the whole OP. We've seen so many stories likes this and it's always total bullshit.
 
What is bullshit exactly? You being too lazy to read the OP, but still thinking your response added to the conversation?

These types of stories happen every few months. 'OMG can you believe how totally innocent this person is? They literally did nothing wrong!!!!1!!'

Then it turns out they tried to run someone over with their car.
 
These types of stories happen every few months. 'OMG can you believe how totally innocent this person is? They literally did nothing wrong!!!!1!!'

Then it turns out they tried to run someone over with their car.
Even if she did, shooting at a fleeing car violates the officers own policy.

Do they pin ribbons on you at work for disregarding policy?
 
Even if she did, shooting at a fleeing car violates the officers own policy.

Do they pin ribbons on you at work for disregarding policy?

Well we're making progress.

It's gone from 'she did literally nothing!!1!' To 'yeah she tried to run a cop over with her car, but he didn't have to be a dick about it.'
 
Back
Top