- Joined
- Jun 15, 2016
- Messages
- 5,232
- Reaction score
- 3,699
It seems like fighters who fight in weight divisions relatively closer to their true weight, or fighters who move up in weight typically have more success.
Is it fact or a myth that moving down in weight makes you more "chinny?" Is it something to do with equilibrium/brain? Or does it have to do with having a speed disadvantage while having lost muscle in the transition?
I am real curious to see how a guy like Luke Rockhold looks when he fights at 205. He cuts a tremendous amount of weight and definitely is chinny at 185. I have stood next to him and he is HUGE. He has all the technical ability in the world, but when it comes to speed and chin at 185, he is getting destroyed.
Size advantage is definitely important, but there seems to be a real law of diminishing returns when too much weight is cut.
You would think that a bigger fighter who is successful in a bigger weight class moving down on weight would easily (on paper) have advantages over a similar fighter in a lower division. That just isn't the case
Is it fact or a myth that moving down in weight makes you more "chinny?" Is it something to do with equilibrium/brain? Or does it have to do with having a speed disadvantage while having lost muscle in the transition?
I am real curious to see how a guy like Luke Rockhold looks when he fights at 205. He cuts a tremendous amount of weight and definitely is chinny at 185. I have stood next to him and he is HUGE. He has all the technical ability in the world, but when it comes to speed and chin at 185, he is getting destroyed.
Size advantage is definitely important, but there seems to be a real law of diminishing returns when too much weight is cut.
You would think that a bigger fighter who is successful in a bigger weight class moving down on weight would easily (on paper) have advantages over a similar fighter in a lower division. That just isn't the case