Also the highly educated, older voters, and wealthier ones (
http://www.cnn.com/election/primaries/polls/ny/dem), while Sanders won uneducated whites.
Of course she won the first three. The "highly educated" also happen to be, by and large, the "wealthier" in a market economy. The majority of them will always opt for either the richest or the most degree'd democrat in the race. It's about kindred spirits.
And older voters are, with rare exceptions (like Bernie himself), simply beaten-down, fully-programmed, Establishment genuflectors.
And by throwing the qualifier "white" in there on the "uneducated" primary voter block it proves you understood damn well that my previous post's inclusion of the word "urban" was PC code for "non-white".
And how do these numbers break down according to your link?
Whites without a degree: 55% to 45% - Sanders (a margin of only 10 points).
Non-whites without a degree: 71% to 29% - Clinton (a margin of over 40 points). lol
But nice attempt at spinning the data. Maybe readers of your post who don't follow the link will walk away thinking that Sanders won the high-school drop out and GED demographic in a landslide.
Maybe a "true progressive" who is himself completely sheltered from any negative consequences of bad policy and who doesn't give a shit about anyone but himself. For the rest of us, our hope is that Clinton wins. It is interesting how alleged "true progressives" are always rooting for rightward turns in policy.
It's this shit again...
I know you're political adroit enough to understand that if Trump walks into the Oval Office it will be as an instant lame duck - with four years to go.
The man is obviously despised by the dems. But, most importantly, despised by the vast majority of the GOP. There will be not one, significant policy change (that might hurt the most vulnerable Americans) achieved on his watch.
Instead, it will basically be a sick comedy of personal, verbal embarrassment and congressional gridlock. Resulting in a virtually irreparable tarnishing of the republican brand. Maybe even a dissolution, for all intents and purposes, of the party.
(On the other hand, if Cruz were to be the nominee and beat Clinton in the general, that could potentially be costly to the working and middle class - relative to the costs they will incur by way of Hillary "The Harlot of Wall Street" Clinton.)
Whereas, with four years of Clinton the true progressive American citizen is faced with the wrist-slitting Hobson's choice of either
eight years of Clinton... or a potentially competent, effective conservative republican as president in 2020.