Treating all techniques as equally valid is one of the hallmark features of martial arts that don't work well against resisting opponents. I see this a lot with Aikido.
Totally agree. I did Aikido for 12 years and trained with many of the world's most senior instructors. What Sauer is doing here is something I saw constantly. He's got a valid technical idea, though perhaps narrowly valid, the presentation of which is elevated to a level of near-mysticism by his social standing in our community. No one wants to be "that guy who smashed a 65 year old coral belt", so he can get away with a lot of things which would cultivate more skepticism coming from anyone else.
I am NOT saying that Sauer is bullshiting us or that this idea has no value. It's just that his seniority leads us to under-examine the boundary conditions on where this idea is applicable. Basically, the more "secret" a technique seems, the higher the level of skepticism that should be applied. Other venerable BJJ coaches like Fabio Gurgel, Cavalcanti, Renzo, Danaher, etc., who have more of a competitive focus, should perhaps get more benefit of the doubt since there are readily-available examples of elite athletes using their lessons (which is why nothing they teach is "novel").
Were Roger Gracie an active competitor today, he would wreck all these new trends with basic old school Gracie jiu jitsu principles like he did for years. You better put some respect on it.
Kron and Roger both won with and teach exceptionally clean traditional fundamentals tested under full pressure. All we have to do is look at their matches to see the efficacy. No one is disrespecting that.
Last edited: