- Joined
- May 7, 2012
- Messages
- 1,097
- Reaction score
- 0
You said Cage Warriors, in which Conor fought twice consecutively (for Cage Warriors) at lightweight. What part of that confuses you? His last fight before fighting in the UFC was at lightweight, and it was his second time fighting as a lightweight for that organization.
Do you know what consecutive means?
adjective
- 1.
following each other continuously | following one after the order in order
You're either having fun or you are legitimately a ding-dong. Probably having fun. Lets copy-pasta what I wrote verbatim:
"For his part, Conor looked like an old dying goat on the scale at 145lbs. Drawn in and miserable. Suffice to say making that cut, by all accounts, was brutal.
He's a natural 155lbs fighter and thats where he fought before he took an opportunity with the UFC. I think without the brutal weight cut we see the best Conor McGregor we've ever seen. The cut to 145lbs was holding him back if anything."
If he was a natural 155lber, why has he fought 18 of 21 fights at FW and of his 3 LW fights, two of them he fought at LW because his FW opponent pulled out. If those opponents didn't pull out, then his one and only fight at LW would have been in 2010.
I didn't cast aspersion his performances, I'm clearly noting that its not healthy for him to make heroic cuts. You can add to this by noting long term, this will be bad, or perhaps you live in a parallel universe where he'll be 27 years old forever.
Without the brutal weight cut, we get the best Conor McGregor we've ever seen. That is not hard to understand, you just want to build some other narrative and inject into the discussion.
Weight cutting is not healthy for any fighter, hence the reason they are trying to cut it out.