• Xenforo Cloud has scheduled an upgrade to XenForo version 2.2.16. This will take place on or shortly after the following date and time: Jul 05, 2024 at 05:00 PM (PT) There shouldn't be any downtime, as it's just a maintenance release. More info here

Media President Trump Will Attend UFC 264 Along other Celebrities

K.

Rules: laws targeting signatures and matching names on documents, marijuana laws, police targeting black neighborhoods (stop and frisk), felony disenfranchisement.
For the most part the laws aren't explicitly against black people, but keep (by law) a status obtained with explicitly racist laws until the 60's.
Politicians even said as much out loud so that is a given.

Practices: racial profiling, bias in medicine, bias in hiring (VERY documented with studies), prison labor, bias in property selling and service offering, difference in sentences (blacks get harsher punishment), bail system.

Culture: this is very broad and I can't sum it up in here, and there are tons of sources. Note that they WILL be biased since it's mostly black people telling their experiences.
But just looking at commercials or comparing news coverage (when it doesn't involve politics) is a good start.

I'm gonna assume the question was in good faith and you'll do your follow up research.


Howd yall get talking on politics lol.
I don't want to speak for the gentleman you're debating but I think he meant currently. You provided a lot of information about history in which we have legislation already to remedy.
If you're not speaking to the current books you're likely using scripted worldviews/points given to you by news coverage and commercials that leave out context to a claim.
 
I would say he likely is a trumper. From the looks of it most of his peers are and his former coaches.
Dustin is a trump supporter. I met him at a casino a few years ago. He nodded in agreement when i said MAGA to him.
 
The orange orangutan lost to Obama's 100 year old assistant LOL!!!!
 
Yes, even though voting turnout is correlated with popularity...Yeah, keep reaching for straws lol.

Losing by nearly 4 percent in a presidential election is the mma equivalent of 30-27s across the board, if not worse.

it's literally not lol... the entire planet was locked inside their homes... all metrics were off and Trump and Biden still managed to destroy Obama

Biden carried Obama in 2008. That's what the data shows.
 
Biden carried Obama in 2008. That's what the data shows.
You know nothing of U.S. politics if you think VP choices do anything more than deliver a state. They don't win you elections.
 
Obviously those who burn and loot are assholes, but the protests themselves are justified.
The protests aren't justified because what they're protesting is being overblown by the media; the media pushing this narrative are doing so at the behest of the Democratic party who don't want to lose control of the black vote.

First of all, Marxism isn't bad (quite the opposite actually)
Marxists believe in socialism and overthrowing capitalism, which is bad (I doubt either of us will change each other's mind on this particular subject, so let's just save time and agree to disagree now).

Marxist people sure as hell do not want to "destroy the nuclear family".
Allow me to clarify: BLM are Marxists who also want to destroy the nuclear family.

Firstly, I'm about to show you, that the racism against people of color, is in fact, systemic. (Just not in this reply yet).
I expect this thread to get locked pretty soon.

Secondly, black people killing each other does not at all disprove that there's a massive problem with racism amongst the police.
I merely used that as an example of how the media blows things out of proportion in order to push a narrative for the purpose of maintaining control.

A simple way to determine if it's as "massive" a "problem" as you and the media claims, ask yourself this: how many interactions do black people have with the police per year and of those interactions how many times are black people unjustifiably killed? When you come up with the actual percentage I'm sure it'd be tough to argue that it's as "massive" a "problem" as you previously thought.

What's sad is that the number of black people killed by cops was actually trending downwards before the media started pushing this narrative.

Well said bro!
Liberals do not want the black man to lose his grievances, hence they continue to perpetuate “systemic racism” in order to be on the opposite side of that “system”.

they want you to believe that everything is racist so they could fight said racism. They created an enemy so they could fight it. And lots of black people who are down and out rally with that believing their democrat leaders are doing it for them, but instead are making it worse for them.
While not everything Malcolm said in this speech applies to modern times, the tactics haven't changed at all:


For most of the 2000's, if you were against the War in Iraq you were accused of being unpatriotic; this was just a tactic used to maintain control; replace "War in Iraq" with "BLM" and "unpatriotic" with "racist" and it's the same thing going on today.
 
Last edited:
The protests aren't justified because what they're protesting is being overblown by the media; the media pushing this narrative are doing so at the behest of the Democratic party who don't want to lose control of the black vote.


Marxists believe in socialism and overthrowing capitalism, which is bad (I doubt either of us will change each other's mind on this particular subject, so let's just save time and agree to disagree now).


Allow me to clarify: BLM are Marxists who also want to destroy the nuclear family.


I expect this thread to get locked pretty soon.


I merely used that as an example of how the media blows things out of proportion in order to push a narrative for the purpose of maintaining control.

A simple way to determine if it's as "massive" a "problem" as you and the media claims, ask yourself this: how many interactions do black people have with the police per year and of those interactions how many times are black people unjustifiably killed? When you come up with the actual percentage I'm sure it'd be tough to argue that it's as "massive" a "problem" as you previously thought.

What's sad is that the number of black people killed by cops was actually trending downwards before the media started pushing this narrative.


While not everything Malcolm said in this speech applies to modern times, the tactics haven't changed at all:


For most of the 2000's, if you were against the War in Iraq you were accused of being unpatriotic; this was just a tactic used to maintain control; replace "War in Iraq" with "BLM" and "unpatriotic" with "racist" and it's the same thing going on today.



The number you were looking for is .0000000225% of police interactions end in the shooting of an unarmed african american. 80% of which are done by officers of color.

That numbers determined by the number of annual year over year shootings of unarmed african americans divided by the average daily police interactions with citizens times the amount of officers on the force times the amount of days they work in a year. The 80% stat is taken from FBI/DOJ data.
 
The protests aren't justified because what they're protesting is being overblown by the media; the media pushing this narrative are doing so at the behest of the Democratic party who don't want to lose control of the black vote.
I think they are very much justified, since i am of the opinion that systemic racism is a thing - if you don't believe the latter to be a thing, of course our opinion will differ, i guess.
Marxists believe in socialism and overthrowing capitalism, which is bad (I doubt either of us will change each other's mind on this particular subject, so let's just save time and agree to disagree now).
Adressed this in the message i sent you, but talk to me about it if you should ever feel about it.
Allow me to clarify: BLM are Marxists who also want to destroy the nuclear family.
Adressed this one also (for readers of this post: "
It’s an exaggeration to say that the BLM organization wants to abolish, dismantle, or end the nuclear family, but they do aim to move society (and likely public policy) away from a full embrace of the nuclear family as the preferred familial structure in black society.

Here is what they actually said on their website (which, notably, has since been removed and the page no longer exists)": "We make our spaces family-friendly and enable parents to fully participate with their children. We dismantle the patriarchal practice that requires mothers to work “double shifts” so that they can mother in private even as they participate in public justice work.

We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.")
I expect this thread to get locked pretty soon.
Understandably, but i don't think the discussions are as heated yet.
I merely used that as an example of how the media blows things out of proportion in order to push a narrative for the purpose of maintaining control.

A simple way to determine if it's as "massive" a "problem" as you and the media claims, ask yourself this: how many interactions do black people have with the police per year and of those interactions how many times are black people unjustifiably killed? When you come up with the actual percentage I'm sure it'd be tough to argue that it's as "massive" a "problem" as you previously thought.

What's sad is that the number of black people killed by cops was actually trending downwards before the media started pushing this narrative.
Systemic racism isn't limited to the police, but even the racism amongst the police is in my eyes still a huge problem and numbers-wise more than big enough of a problem to deserve lots of attention, sherbro.

EDIT: and racism isn't limited to killing people
 
We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.")
Ironic considering the BLM leader used donation money to buy expensive homes (plural) in white neighborhoods away from black people.

Systemic racism isn't limited to the police, but even the racism amongst the police is in my eyes still a huge problem and numbers-wise more than big enough of a problem to deserve lots of attention, sherbro.

EDIT: and racism isn't limited to killing people
Are there racist police officers out there? Yes.
Do the above officers represent a "massive" percentage of all the officers in America? No.

And how exactly do you quantify "racist behavior"? What you (or others) might consider racist could just as easily be something else entirely. And that's precisely where the media comes in to spin an interaction between a police officer and a black person in order to push their narrative. I've lost count of how many times I've seen (in person or on the news) a black person resisting arrest for doing something illegal, and solely because a black person is shown getting arrested by a white cop, it's attempted to be spun as racism.
 
It’s too bad political parties aren’t illegal.

This way we’d be done with all this partisan nonsense.
 
Ironic considering the BLM leader used donation money to buy expensive homes (plural) in white neighborhoods away from black people.


Are there racist police officers out there? Yes.
Do the above officers represent a "massive" percentage of all the officers in America? No.

And how exactly do you quantify "racist behavior"? What you (or others) might consider racist could just as easily be something else entirely. And that's precisely where the media comes in to spin an interaction between a police officer and a black person in order to push their narrative. I've lost count of how many times I've seen (in person or on the news) a black person resisting arrest for doing something illegal, and solely because a black person is shown getting arrested by a white cop, it's attempted to be spun as racism.

The odd thing to me is the emphasis on supremacy.

Lots of people think they're better than one or another... a very small percentage think so on the basis of race. IMO if someone in their head sees themselves as better than someone else....it's mostly their internal conflict, ego, arrogance, etc. We have many more violent criminals, rapists, traffickers, murderers than we do people who in their head believe they're better than someone else on the grounds of race. I don't understand the EXTREME emphasis on supremacy. It's such a disproportionate issue.
 
He’s a private citizen, it’s fine.

But I’m curious to see how he’s received at public events with mixed crowds, as opposed to his rallies where everyone is there to praise him. I have a feeling he will hear a mix of cheers and boos. Boos can be distinctly louder than cheers and we know he’s a sensitive man.
 
Being rational enough to realize that Trump is a con man and a fraud does not make one radical or left.
<PlusJuan>

THIS.

It amazes me how Trumpers think that just because someone is able to see the obvious conman that Trump is automatically makes them left, liberal, or (my favorite) socialist/communist. When the can't even define the two, much less know the differences in the two.
 
Back
Top