Prime Lindsay Lohan was something

listrahtes said:
I never wrote you can get it at "any establishment". You guys need a course for reading comprehension and basic logic. I said its zero problem getting alcohol and it is. There are specialised stores like MMI were you can get it and everyone knows that. As long as she has not converted to islam she will have no problem at all getting as much alcohol as she wants. Jesus you guys are slow witted.
Click to expand...
You are actually correct. I just read that Dubai has drastically relaxed their laws about residents/non-residents purchasing alcohol in recent years. Lindsay did marry a Muslim man although I don't know if she converted to Islam or not.
 
Fuglee said:
That's funny because the meme you posted includes a woman who at her absolute best is a 6.
Click to expand...

O...K...

The woman's not the point, the quote is.

However, giving her and prime Lohan the same score highlights how stratospherically ridiculous calling prime Lohan a 6 is.
 
A lot of these bitches are fine in their prime.

Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera and others were all fuck city in the beginning.

But then they all fade understandably.
 
Yorick said:
A lot of these bitches are fine in their prime.

Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera and others were all fuck city in the beginning.
Click to expand...
Aguilera is still very fine and looks great .
 
RIP @LiLoMMA

giphy.gif
 
Jack Reacheround said:
Yeah, it’s not exactly shocking that a bunch of dudes who consider Matt Walsh their personal hero think that a girl’s prime ends when she’s 18.
Click to expand...

I'm not exactly sure where the 180 happened on this. Maybe like 3-4 years ago? Probably around the time of the Andrew Tate and similar types of internet mouth pieces came around. They basically use pseudo bro science mixed with actual biological science to promote the sexualization of 16-24 year olds who aren't even full developed biologically or socially. Tate specifically used it to justify predatory behavior on this age group so that he could traffic and prostitute them, weak minded men listened to the explanations and found it a reasonable thing to do. But this is in stark contrast to a few years ago, where even on here people would be opposed to that. I wish many daughters on anyone who thinks it's cool.

Considering Matt Walsh and his stance on protecting children from state sponsored genital mutilation, I find it hard to believe that he'd have a stance where he'd be a borderline Hebephiliac. Don't watch a lot on the guy though. So correct me if I'm wrong.
 
Omegaboy13 said:
I'm not exactly sure where the 180 happened on this. Maybe like 3-4 years ago? Probably around the time of the Andrew Tate and similar types of internet mouth pieces came around. They basically use pseudo bro science mixed with actual biological science to promote the sexualization of 16-24 year olds who aren't even full developed biologically or socially. Tate specifically used it to justify predatory behavior on this age group so that he could traffic and prostitute them, weak minded men listened to the explanations and found it a reasonable thing to do. But this is in stark contrast to a few years ago, where even on here people would be opposed to that. I wish many daughters on anyone who thinks it's cool.

Considering Matt Walsh and his stance on protecting children from state sponsored genital mutilation, I find it hard to believe that he'd have a stance where he'd be a borderline Hebephiliac. Don't watch a lot on the guy though. So correct me if I'm wrong.
Click to expand...

You think grown men didn't like 20 year old chicks til Andrew Tate came along?
 
Pliny Pete said:
You think grown men didn't like 20 year old chicks til Andrew Tate came along?
Click to expand...

No. Just was less common for 35+ year old men to advocate for it openly on the internet.... and to chastise men who point out that they're pining over biologically underdeveloped, and thus, a vulnerable age group. Part of the allure that older men see in younger women is that they are more easily manipulated. Seems a bit predatory to me. To each their own I suppose. I certainly believe it has become much more accepted for older men to do so in the last few years as extremism has touched many facets of life.
 
Omegaboy13 said:
I'm not exactly sure where the 180 happened on this. Maybe like 3-4 years ago? Probably around the time of the Andrew Tate and similar types of internet mouth pieces came around. They basically use pseudo bro science mixed with actual biological science to promote the sexualization of 16-24 year olds who aren't even full developed biologically or socially. Tate specifically used it to justify predatory behavior on this age group so that he could traffic and prostitute them, weak minded men listened to the explanations and found it a reasonable thing to do. But this is in stark contrast to a few years ago, where even on here people would be opposed to that. I wish many daughters on anyone who thinks it's cool.

Considering Matt Walsh and his stance on protecting children from state sponsored genital mutilation, I find it hard to believe that he'd have a stance where he'd be a borderline Hebephiliac. Don't watch a lot on the guy though. So correct me if I'm wrong.
Click to expand...
There was never a 180 because that was always their position. All those who protest so much about “protecting the children” do so to use it as cover.
 
Omegaboy13 said:
Lol!

But they are children, right?
Click to expand...
Who?
I’m just saying that all of those who most vehemently protest “corrupting the children” or “grooming” are usually the groomers or those with such compulsions.
Kind of like how all the people most against homosexuality are closeted homosexuals.
 
Jack Reacheround said:
Who?
I’m just saying that all of those who most vehemently protest “corrupting the children” or “grooming” are usually the groomers or those with such compulsions.
Click to expand...

All those? I dunno man, I think the argument could also become circular and a logical fallacy there. Maybe all those who reflect in such a way say such things because they themselves want to divert attention from their own behavior and action as well? Anyone who isn't a total psycho wants to protect children.

Or maybe, just maybe, groomers are groomers, shitbags are shitbags, and old men pining after 18 year olds is fucked up behavior for grown men. It's possible that I just have too many daughters. I guess my line in the sand is that I believe there is a difference between what is legal and ethical. I know some the general ages of the guys in this thread. I don't think they'd dare sexualize a 16 year old in their real world personal lives outside of their shitty circle of male friends. I just don't associate with men who are like that. I wouldn't put my daughters in a situation where I keep a man with low morality around who's possible ulterior motive is waiting for her to turn 18.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,237,451
Messages
55,491,810
Members
174,789
Latest member
Jahmaltheknight

Share this page

Back
Top