Economy Puerto Rico in Bankruptcy: Oversight Board Proposes To Screw Bondholders In Favor of Pensioners

Yeah this does not surprise me at all.

At least with the other municipal BKs you could argue that the investors knew the risks and so does the municipalities. The repricing of debt is a normal reaction to risk resulting from the cities behavior. But with PR when people advocate just making up the rules as they go, well it adds a new level of risk pricing that has to go into the mix. You know have to factor in how you are going to be treated or how even someone who you sell the debt to, will be treated, into pricing.

The oversight board just presented their idea: completely ignore the fact that the Puerto Rican constitution mandated that General Obligation bonds must be paid first, and give PR public pension fund first priority instead. Bondholders gets a massive 66% haircut, while pension fund only get a 17% reduction.

We can safely consider any constitutional-guaranteed General Obligation bond that Puerto Rico try to sells in the future to have the same appeal as toxic waste now.


$129 Billion Puerto Rico Bankruptcy Plan Could Be Model for States
By Mary Williams Walsh and Karl Russell | Sept. 27, 2019

images

After years of wrangling with its creditors, Puerto Rico disclosed a plan Friday for resolving the biggest governmental bankruptcy in United States history, by cutting $129 billion in debts to about $86 billion — a reduction of 33 percent.

The plan hatched by a seven-member federal oversight board is now before a federal judge, who will decide any disputes. There are sure to be plenty — the various parties are tangled in an unprecedented financial collapse. Puerto Rico’s inability to pay its debts required Congress to create a new law, called Promesa, that allowed a territory to essentially seek bankruptcy protection.

If the plan survives the challenges ahead, it could be a model for how struggling states deal with their financial problems in the future. Illinois, New Jersey and others are weighed down by heavy debts, particularly their pension obligations. But like Puerto Rico before Promesa, states cannot declare bankruptcy — it would require congressional action to extend a version of that framework to them.

The efforts to make Puerto Rico solvent have been complicated, requiring novel maneuvers by the oversight board that must garner the support of enough stakeholders to move forward.

Those parties, which include bondholders, pensioners, current government employees and others, will have a chance to vote on the deal they’re offered, and so far support has been mixed. Some bondholders have supported the plan, while others have signaled a willingness to fight it out in court. The island’s teachers rejected the plan in a preliminary vote, but 167,000 government retirees haven’t yet been polled.

Puerto Rico’s plan makes certain bondholders seem like the big losers. It would trim the island’s bond obligations to $41 billion from $75 billion — a 45 percent reduction. But that’s just an average. Under the surface, some bondholders will get 64 cents on the dollar, while others will get just 35 percent. A lucky few — those holding a certain type of sales tax-supported bond — come out with 93 cents on the dollar. Others could risk getting nothing at all.

The new plan may look like it’s wiping out billions in debt overnight, but in reality, a lot of the losses have been sustained already. The bonds have been actively traded since they were issued, and the territory’s steadily worsening financial situation pushed their value down over the years. Their prices bottomed out after Hurricane Maria two years ago.

For an investor who bought, say, a 30-year general obligation bond when it was issued in 2009, then held it until now, the new debt plan spells a 36 percent loss. He might be kicking himself for not selling back in 2012, when he could have come close to breaking even. In Puerto Rico, these bonds carry a constitutional guarantee and were supposed to be bulletproof.

But an investor who bought the same bond amid the devastation of Hurricane Maria, when nearly everybody else was selling, would have paid around 20 percent of the face value. From his perspective, the new debt plan more than triples his money.

To nudge some disappointed investors into supporting the plan, the oversight board is playing something of a game of chicken with those who bought Puerto Rico’s most recent vintages of general obligation bonds, issued in 2012 and 2014.

The board has said it believes the newer bonds should never have been issued because they took the island over its legal debt limit. The new plan offers investors who hold them settlements well below the 64 cents on the dollar the other bondholders are getting. If they don’t like it, they can sue, and try to convince the federal judge overseeing the case, Laura Taylor Swain, that their bonds are valid. If they win, they would get 64 cents on the dollar like everyone else. If they lose, they would get nothing — and the money set aside for them would be given instead to the investors already getting 64 cents.


Other legal challenges await the plan from bondholders who believe the board was far too generous to Puerto Rico’s retired government workers.

Over the years, the government of Puerto Rico, seeing the huge problem the unfunded pension obligations presented, made some moves to limit the damage. In 2013, it forced new hires into a defined contribution plan, similar to a 401(k). A few years later, it forced all current employees, regardless of hire date, into such a plan.

Those moves did reduce the island’s pension obligations, but not enough to save the system from collapse. The new restructuring plan would cut the island’s $54.5 billion pension obligation to $45 billion, this time affecting even retirees. Their pension would be cut on a sliding scale: The biggest pensions would be reduced by, at most, 8.5 percent, and the smallest pensions would not be cut at all.

That will be a big complaint of general obligation bondholders, who cite the constitutional provision putting them at the front of the line to be paid.

Puerto Rico’s retirees, on the other hand, would normally be at the back. That’s because the island’s pension fund is completely empty after being used for years as a source of money to pay the government’s expenses. An empty pension fund would ordinarily make the retirees unsecured creditors entitled to almost nothing.

But the retirees make up such a large share of the island’s economy that leaving them in the lurch might chill efforts to rekindle economic growth.

So the federal board leaned on language in Promesa to improve the retirees’ legal standing. That language, not present elsewhere in American bankruptcy law, requires Puerto Rico to “provide adequate funding for public pension systems.” The board also persuaded the island’s lawmakers to dismantle the empty pension fund and in the future make each year’s pension benefits a mandatory outlay of the budget.

The result is retirees get a better deal than almost any other creditor group: at least 91.5 cents on the dollar.


Natalie Jaresko, the board’s executive director, said the board’s main goal was reducing Puerto Rico’s debts to a level its economy could sustain. That has been a two-step process.

First, the board looked at the debt burdens of America’s 10 most indebted states, calculated the average, and pared back Puerto Rico’s debt to an amount less than that. Then it began pushing for changes meant to make the government perform more efficiently, rebuild the public trust and encourage businesses to grow and hire. To make it all work, consumers on the island need to be able to spend money — including Puerto Rico’s pensioners.

“Sustainability is not a requirement of the law, but we really wanted it to be at the center of everything we did,” Ms. Jaresko said. “We weren’t going to end up in a situation where 10 years from now, 12 years from now, Puerto Rico would have to restructure again.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/27/business/puerto-rico-bankruptcy-promesa.html
 
Last edited:
The oversight board just presented their idea: completely ignore the fact that the Puerto Rican constitution mandated that General Obligation bonds must be paid first, and give PR public pension fund first priority instead. Bondholders gets a massive 66% haircut, while pension fund only get a 17% reduction.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/27/business/puerto-rico-bankruptcy-promesa.html

We can safely consider any constitutional-guaranteed General Obligation bond that Puerto Rico try to sells in the future to have the same appeal as toxic waste now.

Yup

And while I have zero sympathy for hedge funds that bought these at distressed values (they knew the legal uncertainties and risks here), you can't begrudge them for trying to get 100 cents on the dollar either. And this does not help the original creditor who sold at a discount. What is more that original creditor's discount may have been much higher (depending on when he sold ie say 2012) if this haircut was known ahead of time.

But I also don't blame PR for treating pensioners better than other debt holders. To me that's tantamount to saying "should we wipe out debt or cut social programs"? But it is certainly not sustainable going forward. People understand the game now, PR had special access to debt, abused it, and now they will lose that tool. Things like infrastructure and other investments will made just that much harder by this.
 
Yup

And while I have zero sympathy for hedge funds that bought these at distressed values (they knew the legal uncertainties and risks here), you can't begrudge them for trying to get 100 cents on the dollar either. And this does not help the original creditor who sold at a discount. What is more that original creditor's discount may have been much higher (depending on when he sold ie say 2012) if this haircut was known ahead of time.

But I also don't blame PR for treating pensioners better than other debt holders. To me that's tantamount to saying "should we wipe out debt or cut social programs"? But it is certainly not sustainable going forward. People understand the game now, PR had special access to debt, abused it, and now they will lose that tool. Things like infrastructure and other investments will made just that much harder by this.

It's worth noting that CNN previously reported that only less than 25% of Puerto Rico's bonds were held by the hedge funds that Senator Warren and Sanders love to rails against, while more than 75% of PR bondholders are just regular Americans who invested their life savings on the attractiveness of Puerto Rico's "iron-clad and bullet-proof" Constitutional guarantees for their G.O bonds.

I can only hope that a majority of these regular joes and janes managed to offload their retirement's investments to the Wall Street "vulture funds" at a discounted price since then, and may be broke even and got their retirement savings back long before the oversight board tries to render the Puerto Rican Constitution invalid.

The convenient (and incredibly offensive) narrative that the politicians in Washington sympathetic to Puerto Rico's plight loves to push from the very first day of the bankruptcy was that Puerto Rico is the real victim here, while people on the mainland who invested their hard-earned money to buy the bonds sold by Puerto Rico are the real villains, and that makes it ethical and imperative to screw the investors in order for Puerto Rico to get back on track, Constitutional guarantees be damned.

There's no concrete updated data on current PR bonds ownerships now, but I sincerely hope that 25/75 investors demographic had flipped in the last two years, so that victim/villain assessment could remotely be true.
 
Last edited:
CNN previously reported that only less than 25% of Puerto Rico's bonds were held by the hedge funds that Senator Warren and Sanders love to rails against, while more than 75% of PR bondholders are just regular Americans who invested their life savings on the attractiveness of Puerto Rico's "iron-clad and bullet-proof" Constitutional guarantees for their G.O bonds.

I can only hope that a majority of these regular joes and janes managed to offload their retirement's investments to the Wall Street "vulture funds" at a didcount since then, and may be broke even and get their retirement savings back.

The convenient and incredibly offensive narrative that politicians sympathetic to Puerto Rico's plight in Washington loves to push from the very first day of the bankruptcy is that the Puerto Ricans are the real victims while people who invested their hard-earned money into Puerto Rico are the real villains. There's no concrete updated data on this now, but I sincerely hope that 25/75 investors demographic had flipped in the last two years so that victim/villain assessment could remotely be true.
How to spin this

well if all those people weren’t racist against brown people they wouldn’t have bought those bonds
 
Wow, pensioners are actually protesting the oversight board's proposal to pay them first with a tiny haircut compare to the massive beating for the bondholders who supposed to have higher priority but are now at risk of being pushed back of the line.

Do they even understand how this works, or how sweet of a deal that they're getting?? o_O

If Puerto Ricans actually vote down the proposal to screw the bondholders in their favor, then I fully understand how the inhabitants on this bankrupted island have arrived at this point: sheer stupidity.

Puerto Rico Board’s Proposal Spark Pensioners' Anger
By Michael Deibert | October 7, 2019

360x-1.jpg


When Puerto Rico Governor Wanda Vazquez announced late last month that she was acceding to requests from the commonwealth’s Congressionally mandated fiscal oversight board to slash some government-worker pensions by as much as 8.5%, the reaction was swift.
Protesters returned to the front of the governor’s mansion in San Juan’s colonial quarter - the site of protests that eventually ousted former governor Ricardo Rossello this past summer - and even at what they believed to be the private homes of board members, chanting and banging on pots and pans in what is known as a cacerolazo (the name coming from the Spanish word for a pot used to cook stew, cacerola).

Adding her voice to the street protests, Maite Oronoz Rodríguez, the head of Puerto Rico’s Supreme Court, sent a letter to the board warning of mass resignations in the island’s judiciary because of pension concerns, stating that “after a lifetime of dedication and service to Puerto Rico, our judges do not deserve to be speculating about their future based on the limited information” she said the board had made public about its plans.

Despite her televised statement that she did “not support any reduction in benefits to retirees,” Vazquez nevertheless said she wanted the board to finish its work “as soon as possible” and said that the cuts now would avoid the need for larger pension cuts of up to 25% in the future.

While Vazquez’s administration opposes cutting pensions, it won’t obstruct the progress of the federal board’s debt adjustment plan, Eli Diaz Atienza, the governor’s non-voting board representative, said during a public meeting of the board last month. Still, the administration will seek to alleviate future pension cuts through the commonwealth’s budget, Diaz Atienza said.

“Central to the government’s consideration of the plan, however, is the government’s stated commitment to the priority of pension payments and in practice to take steps where necessary and appropriate to restore and mitigate the impact of any future pension reductions through the exercise of government policy measures in the commonwealth’s budget or through additional sources of revenue,” Diaz Atienza said during the meeting.

https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/...ico-board-s-proposed-pension-cuts-spark-anger
 
Last edited:
It's worth noting that CNN previously reported that only less than 25% of Puerto Rico's bonds were held by the hedge funds that Senator Warren and Sanders love to rails against, while more than 75% of PR bondholders are just regular Americans who invested their life savings on the attractiveness of Puerto Rico's "iron-clad and bullet-proof" Constitutional guarantees for their G.O bonds.

I can only hope that a majority of these regular joes and janes managed to offload their retirement's investments to the Wall Street "vulture funds" at a discounted price since then, and may be broke even and got their retirement savings back long before the oversight board tries to render the Puerto Rican Constitution invalid.

The convenient (and incredibly offensive) narrative that the politicians in Washington sympathetic to Puerto Rico's plight loves to push from the very first day of the bankruptcy was that Puerto Rico is the real victim here, while people on the mainland who invested their hard-earned money to buy the bonds sold by Puerto Rico are the real villains, and that makes it ethical and imperative to screw the investors in order for Puerto Rico to get back on track.

There's no concrete updated data on current PR bonds ownerships now, but I sincerely hope that 25/75 investors demographic had flipped in the last two years, so that victim/villain assessment could remotely be true.

Yeah I hope so too.

Thing is if you owed 2009 bonds and held them after moodies said they were one notch above junk and they were still above par, then you at least had some opportunity to get out whole. What is noteworthy is to compare where these things went to went they were called junk in in 2014 vs the final settlement. And 2014 investors had to be really out to lunch to trust that gaurentee.

But I take your point, trying to pit bondholders of one class vs. another when they both might be old ladies eating dog food is disingenuous. I would be interested as well to see how much of this paper was traded out and how much has been held onto by original retail investors/retirement funds.
 
Bond insurer MBIA sues banks over defaulted Puerto Rico bonds

Bond insurance company MBIA Inc sued several financial institutions on Thursday over their role in underwriting billions of dollars of Puerto Rico bonds that eventually went into default.

The lawsuit filed in superior court in San Juan claimed the banks “inflicted a financial tragedy” on the now-bankrupt U.S. commonwealth by urging it to issue “unsustainable” debt.

“That debt bankrupted the commonwealth and its agencies while the banks enriched themselves through massive fees,” the lawsuit stated.

Puerto Rico filed for bankruptcy in 2017 to restructure about $120 billion of debt and pension obligations.

According to the lawsuit, major banks underwrote more than $66 billion of bonds issued between 2001 and 2014 by Puerto Rico and its agencies, earning hundreds of millions of dollars in fees. The defendants are: UBS Financial Services Inc, UBS Securities LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc, Goldman Sachs & Co LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co LLC; Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc; RBC Capital Markets LLC, and Santander Securities LLC.

MBIA argued that these underwriters failed to do their due diligence on Puerto Rico bonds, which led to disclosures that were “materially false or misleading” and upon which its unit, National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation, relied upon when it decided to insure the debt.

A request for comment from J.P. Morgan was not immediately answered. Representatives of the other banks declined to comment on the lawsuit.

National insured more than $11 billion of Puerto Rico debt. Subsequent defaults led the insurer to make as of July 1 over $720 million in claims payments that the lawsuit seeks to recover in damages from the banks.

The same banks were sued by Puerto Rico’s federally created fiscal oversight board in May for allegedly aiding and abetting the island’s “clearly insolvent” government to issue debt.

https://www.reuters.com/article/usa...ver-defaulted-puerto-rico-bonds-idUSL2N2541FO
 
Back
Top