- Joined
- Jan 10, 2019
- Messages
- 4,215
- Reaction score
- 2,970
The thing that was impressive about Foreman in his 40s isn't what he did but the revealation about how badly he would have beaten the 90s HWs if they were the same age. Hopkins success at 45-50 was just that success at 45-50 it didn't put past dominance into perspective because he didn't have it.
Hopkins greatness comes from stopping Trinidad and De La Hoya when they came up to MW rather than how good a MW or LHW he was. Thats really were his hype comes from
The weird thing about both those fights is that Trinidad was a 3 to 1 favourite to beat Hopkins and I don't think he won a round. Years later, an inactive De LA Hoya looks way better against Hopkins and actually wins some rounds. That always made me raise an eyebrow. Not a big deal I guess, though.