RIP GirlsDoPorn

[Shuque]

of course it is.
why wouldn't it be? cause they pay taxes for sucking dick for money?
grow up.

Dude help me out here...

If you and wife film yourself having sex, then by definition you are making porn.

Would that make your wife a prostitute?

 

[Big Nasty Edison]

I thought GirlsDoPorn was the screen name of a Sherdogger that died when I first read the title of your post.

Now I wish I hadn't changed my screen name recently.

 

[Fox by the Sea]

Dude help me out here...

If you and wife film yourself having sex, then by definition you are making porn.

Would that make your wife a prostitute?

If l have to pay her to fuck me, yeah.

 

[AGGAMEMNON66]

Well these videos will probably be on the internet for the rest of these women’s lives so I think that’s punishment enough.

It’s also pretty much 100% that they won’t get a cent of that money given that the defendant’s are on the run for serious crime.

It’s not about punishment tho imo -it’s about responsibility. As in, taking responsibility for the choices you make. From everything that was presented in the last thread pretty much every chick knew they’d be flying out to do a porn scene. At that point, they’d made a choice attached to the satisfaction of an easy pay day.


That’s why I don’t feel bad in the least for them. These girls may not be scumbags as people -but they made a scumbag choice.

 

[Shuque]

If l have to pay her to fuck me, yeah.

I read both definitions (pornography and prostitution) and there is some intersection in the definitions. A good old Venn diagram would illustrate where the definitions intersect (when the person is paid for sex).

That said, this issue has been discussed before the courts and pornography is deemed to be acting since the purpose of the act is to produce pornography (art) and not simply the delivery of the sexual act.

So you can argue semantics, and based on the definitions of the words you do have an argument, but you should consider the court's opinion as these are the experts (lawyers and judges spent years arguing and weighing the facts).

That said, I'm not sure why anyone would be deemed to having voided any of their rights by participating in either porn or prostitution. Judging these people says as much about the insecurities of the ones judging than it does about the persons participating.

Unfortunately, Sherdog is full of young insecure males who feel better about themselves when they can put others down. Misogyny is rampant here as we have a huge number of incels who need to lash out at the women they desire and who think that women have to comply to their (the incels) own morality in order to be deserving of respect.

 

[Oblivian]

I read both definitions (pornography and prostitution) and there seems that there is some intersection in the definitions. A good old Venn diagram would illustrate where the definitions intersect when the person is paid for sex.

That said, this issue has been discussed before the courts and pornography is deemed to be acting since the purpose of the act is to produce pornography (art) and not simply the delivery of the sexual act.

So you can argue semantics, and based on the definitions of the words you do have an argument, but you should consider the court's opinion as these are the experts (lawyers and judges spent years arguing and weighing the facts).

That said, I'm not sure why anyone would be deemed to having voided any of their rights by participating in either porn or prostitution. Judging these people says as much about the insecurities of the ones judging than it does about the persons participating.

Unfortunately, Sherdog is full of young insecure males who feel better about themselves when they can put others down. Misogyny is rampant here as we have a huge number of incels who need to lash out at the women they desire and who think that women have to comply to their (the incels) own morality in order to be deserving of respect.

I honestly think a lot of college aged girls would gladly receive money for sex if they knew they could get away with it, be safe, and be selective about it. In other words, I think the logistics and practicality of it prevents this. I mean a lot of girls are willing to accept $2k to be on these porns that they know everyone will see and it will be on the internet. If they could get $500 from some guy who isn't grotesque and bang safely in a hotel room, I think they'd be all over it and many other girls would too.

 

[bubbleboyjones]

Him and a lot of the ppl in the thread think girls that get into porn are often just prostituing with a camera there.
I agree with him there in a lot of cases. Especially girls do porn's content.

I think the biggest question is why do people insist on using incorrect definitions on these activities? Are people using prostitute because in their heads it's more demeaning as if a porn star getting a bukkake on 4k video is less in their heads? It's not as if hardcore porn is legal to film everywhere and prostitution is illegal everywhere. They both have legal protections depending where you are on the planet so the idea guys want to die on the hill to call it 'prostitution with a camera' makes no sense. Just call it the proper name.

 

[sweetviolenturg]

I read both definitions (pornography and prostitution) and there seems that there is some intersection in the definitions. A good old Venn diagram would illustrate where the definitions intersect when the person is paid for sex.

That said, this issue has been discussed before the courts and pornography is deemed to be acting since the purpose of the act is to produce pornography (art) and not simply the delivery of the sexual act.

So you can argue semantics, and based on the definitions of the words you do have an argument, but you should consider the court's opinion as these are the experts (lawyers and judges spent years arguing and weighing the facts).

That said, I'm not sure why anyone would be deemed to having voided any of their rights by participating in either porn or prostitution. Judging these people says as much about the insecurities of the ones judging than it does about the persons participating.

Unfortunately, Sherdog is full of young insecure males who feel better about themselves when they can put others down. Misogyny is rampant here as we have a huge number of incels who need to lash out at the women they desire and who think that women have to comply to their (the incels) own morality in order to be deserving of respect.

Damn, spot-on, bro.
My thoughts throughout this whole thread have been whether these guys who are so eager to slut-shame & say the vilest things about these young women have mothers, sisters or daughters that they care about. Apparently not judging by the level of hate & contempt displayed here.

 

[nostradumbass]

This is surprising. Whores usually take responsibility for their actions and never blame everyone else, claim to be victims and demand money because they shouldn't have been treated like adults or expected to have any forethought.

"I thought I was just cheating on my boyfriend on camera for people in Australia to watch. I didn't know he'd find out about it. You owe me a million dollars."

This is like that fat sack of shit who sued McDonald's for making him fat, and fucking won.

 

[Oblivian]

It's funny reading this thread now knowing the result. Some people probably feel foolish...

https://forums.sherdog.com/threads/...lsdoporn-going-bankrupt-getting-sued.3909129/

 

[franklinstower]

of course it is.
why wouldn't it be? cause they pay taxes for sucking dick for money?
grow up.

Im just going by the legal defenition of the terms. Obviously we will go with that over some random persons personal defenition on the net.

In either case it is irrelevant because the girls were victims of fraud and it is illegal to commit fraud against a prostitute.

 

[Kirra]

Strong lol at the incels lashing out against the girls. It's pretty established that they were lied to, they were promised one deal and given another. The initial agreement said that these videos would not be available in America, not be uploaded on the Internet, etc. The contract on the other hand said otherwise. They were also given weed and/or alcohol to "loosen up" before the shoot and only given minutes to read through the contract before signing. Should they have known better? Absolutely, but what GDP did is still misleading and illegal.

Those videos were complete shit anyway. I don't understand how you as a guy can be in the porn industry and still be that bad at fucking. I guess it makes sense why these videos were popular with the incel crowd though.

 

[franklinstower]

Strong lol at the incels lashing out against the girls. It's pretty established that they were lied to, they were promised one deal and given another. The initial agreement said that these videos would not be available in America, not be uploaded on the Internet, etc. The contract on the other hand said otherwise. They were also given weed and/or alcohol to "loosen up" before the shoot and only given minutes to read through the contract before signing. Should they have known better? Absolutely, but what GDP did is still misleading and illegal.

Those videos were complete shit anyway. I don't understand how you as a guy can be in the porn industry and still be that bad at fucking. I guess it makes sense why these videos were popular with the incel crowd though.

Some here think they had it coming for being "whores" and are angry they "got rich" over it.


Not a single one of these types has mentioned or even seemed to notice that one of the criminals committing the fraud was himself an actor in the pornography....

 

[moreorless87]

Honestly threads like this just end up becoming mirrors for peoples opinions on sex and women.

 

[franklinstower]

Honestly threads like this just end up becoming mirrors for peoples opinions on sex and women.

This post is 100% accurate.

 

[Brofessor]

I know a chick who was on there. She's cute too. Did it like a month after she broke up with my buddy.

Pics and link?

 

[AGGAMEMNON66]

I think the biggest question is why do people insist on using incorrect definitions on these activities? Are people using prostitute because in their heads it's more demeaning as if a porn star getting a bukkake on 4k video is less in their heads? It's not as if hardcore porn is legal to film everywhere and prostitution is illegal everywhere. They both have legal protections depending where you are on the planet so the idea guys want to die on the hill to call it 'prostitution with a camera' makes no sense. Just call it the proper name.

Agreed. Besides, both people fucking are getting paid.. who’s the prostitute in that situation..?

 

[franklinstower]

Agreed. Besides, both people fucking are getting paid.. who’s the prostitute in that situation..?

Ding ding ding..... we have a winner here folks!

 

[Brofessor]

When I was a kid, I was caught looking at naked ladies online (happens to the best of us) and I blamed my friend for "tricking" me into clicking a link which I didn't know was porn. Was the obvious excuse so I wouldn't get in trouble or judged. LMAO!

 

[JOE QUEEF]

When I was a kid, I was caught looking at naked ladies online (happens to the best of us) and I blamed my friend for "tricking" me into clicking a link which I didn't know was porn. Was the obvious excuse so I wouldn't get in trouble or judged. LMAO!

“Schwartz!”