- Joined
- Aug 27, 2005
- Messages
- 41,443
- Reaction score
- 0
I bet a staffer came up with it, and they were like:i just sat there blank faced like an idiot thinking, 'that can't be what she had scripted on that piece of paper...right?'
I bet a staffer came up with it, and they were like:i just sat there blank faced like an idiot thinking, 'that can't be what she had scripted on that piece of paper...right?'
that's what gets me, the local sheriff having a "keep roy's dick away from the high school cheerleaders" rule is pretty fucking damning.Twelve people, including two cops and three others from the legal community have confirmed it.
https://www.snopes.com/2017/11/17/roy-moore-banned-mall-harassing-teen-girls/
Further, that is not the sole or even main basis for the claims against him.
Supporting a pedo = supporting a pedo.
That's a fair statement except their names are out and 1 person has been accused of committing 2 heinous acts; 1 of which has no statute of limitations.
If anyone believes the allegations they should be screaming at local officials to investigate and charge Moore.
You quoted one guy saying that he didn't remember it, while I quoted several people saying that they did.
At best, you have it as he-said/she-said, but the problem with that is that there are a lot more people quoted as saying that they remember it than saying that they don't. Again, I think you're being disingenuous. You know it's true and that Moore is a creep. You're just defending him out of partisanship, which I think is sick.
Hmm I haven't noticed that one as much but you could be right. I would like to add "safespace" too.
When i get the free Xm Sirius previews I pretty much switch between all the news and political channels lolI like to flip back and forth between Urban View and Patriot on xm when I drive. Every time something passes or is proposed that the right doesn't like they use the phrase shoved down our throat.
I feel like you're being facetious again and if they actually did that you would not be supportive of those actions.
quit shoving your dislike of that phrase down our throat.I like to flip back and forth between Urban View and Patriot on xm when I drive. Every time something passes or is proposed that the right doesn't like they use the phrase shoved down our throat.
Damn it Jack, you're being dishonest again
You kill your own credibility with this kind of reaction to uncomfortable facts. Why don't you make your theory explicit? We have nine accusers, two dozen people corroborating their stories, and a dozen people who remember him being banned. You're saying this is a conspiracy involving 50 people over multiple decades anticipating that he'd run for office? And no one reported it?
No Jack, I'm saying those people heard a rumor that he was banned from the mall. That doesn't make it a conspiracy, it just makes it an incorrect rumor.
Btw we never heard of mall bans during his other elections. As for your 9 allegatins, there are only 2 that would make him unfit for office, but I really don't care to rehash this entire thread because you haven't read the last few pages.
She didn't forge it unless she claimed he added the date.Roy Moore Accuser Beverly Nelson Admits She Forged Yearbook
Beverly Young Nelson has finally admitted that she forged a portion of the infamous high school yearbook that she and attorney Gloria Allred used as proof of her accusations against U.S. Senate candidate Roy Moore.
And in yet another blow to the credibility of ABC News, the disgraced, left-wing network downplayed the bombshell by presenting this admission of forgery as adding “notes” to the inscription. Worse still, the reporter actually coaches Nelson, puts words in her mouth, downplay the enormous significance of her deceit.
“Nelson admits she did make notes to the inscription,” ABC News tells us. “But the message was all Roy Moore.”
“Beverly, he signed your yearbook,” ABC News reporter Tom Llamas says.
“He did sign it,” she replies.
advertisement
“And you made some notes underneath.”
“Yes,” Nelson says.
And then, after a woman admits to forging a document used in a campaign to destroy the Republican nominee for the U.S. Senate in Alabama, ABC News quickly moves on as though it is not news of extraordinary consequence.
Llamas also fails to ask any follow-ups, such as “If the explanation is this simple, why wait all these weeks to offer it.” Or, “Why did you lie?”
Nelson is accusing Moore of attempting to assault her when she was just 16-years-old. With the election just four days away, this admission of forgery could not come at a better time for Moore. Nelson and Allred are planning a news conference Friday, but nothing will overcome the forgery admission.
How can anyone believe anything she says after admitting to such a thing? Early reports are that Nelson and Allred will produce an expert to prove the rest of the yearbook is not a forgery. So a proven forger is bringing in her own expert. What an insult to the people of Alabama.
Another problem with Nelson is that she has a motive to lie and forge: as a circuit judge, Moore ruled against her in a 1999 divorce case.
The Moore campaign has been pressuring Nelson and Allred for weeks to submit the yearbook for independent handwriting analysis. Now everyone knows why that request was rejected and ignored.
With Nelson now thoroughly discredited, this leaves two accusers against Moore.
One is Leigh Corfman, who claims Moore molested her as a 14-year-old child. She is the most credible of the three, but the narrative behind her story, that Moore’s abuse resulted in Corfman’s living a troubled life of “drinking, drugs, boyfriends, and a suicide attempt,” is directly contradicted by contemporaneous court records.
Moore’s final accuser is Tina Johnson, a woman who claims Moore groped her butt in his office in 1991. But, again, as was the case with Corfman and Nelson, the left-wing media outlets reporting these allegations (the Washington Post, AL.com) either failed to fully vet the accusers or withheld crucial context.
Thanks to New Media’s going behind these discredited outlets to fact check the reporting, we now know that Johnson did not tell the entire truth. She was not in Moore’s office “on business.” If she was in Moore’s office at all, it was due to a bitter custody battle where Moore represented Johnson’s mother, who was trying to gain custody of Johnson’s 12-year-old son based on the claim that Johnson was an “unfit, absent, and unstable mother.”
If the media and the accusers and Gloria Allred told the full truth to begin with, they would all be more credible.
As far as the accusations against Moore involving his wanting to date teenage girls, those are trumped-up charges, utter nonsense. The age of consent in Alabama was and is 16. Moreover, 40 years ago, it was not at all uncommon in the South for a 32-year-old man to seek a much younger bride. So not only did Moore not break the law, he was not violating any social mores.
Something that cops and mall workers were aware of. Seems like if mall workers and cops are enforcing the ban, it's pretty real. Where do you think the rumor came from?
IMO, all nine would make him unfit for office. Two are particularly bad, though. And remember that people didn't come forward. The media got wind of the talk and looked into it. I think it's very obvious that you're defending this creep on purely partisan grounds. I don't think you set out to lower yourself this way, and I'd recommend that you really think about what you're doing.
She didn't forge it unless she claimed he added the date.
All she did was add the date. Moore still signed the yearbook.