Strzok Out!

Liberals tried to sell that garbage all last week. They hear "no bias" in the IG report, and immediately think it applies to everyone in it. Meanwhile, the IG report specifically said Strzok and Page were compromised by their political bias. The "no bias" part in the IG report was referring to Comey.

Even saw Cuomo on CNN trying to argue that bullshit to a Republican Senator, who pretty much laughed in his face.

Bullshit. The conclusion was that the texts demonstrated a clear political bias, but no indication whatsoever that this bias played any role in the subsequent events.

You guys try and change history with ever different news cycle.
 
lol

"So what that they were biased towards the people they investigated? Doesn't mean the investigation was biased!"

Fucking wow.
 
Oh noes! I guess this proves that Trump is completely clear from all wrong doing. Case closed liburlz.

Yep, that locker room video never happened, we're talking about vile character assassination campaign against an upstanding family man who never raped his wife, rawdogged a pornstar and tried to pay her off, lied to the country or sold the presidency to the Russians. All a big charade orchestrated by the mastermind FBI agent! You filthy anti-American scum!
<BirdieOwn>
 
Bullshit. The conclusion was that the texts demonstrated a clear political bias, but no indication whatsoever that this bias played any role in the subsequent events.

You guys try and change history with ever different news cycle.

What events? Because it specifically states that they did not have confidence that Stzrok's decision to prioritize the Russian investigation over the Clinton investigation was free from bias. Is prioritizing one investigation over another not an "event"?

What they said was that the conclusions reached in the Clinton investigation were free from bias. They clearly stated that Stzrok had been compromised by bias in how he went about his business in investigations. They can't comment on if the conclusions he found the Russian investigation were free from bias, since he was removed...because it was found out he was biased.
 
good-godba-let-the-jimmies-rustle-through-you-8308619.png

I think he was pointing out your blatant hypocrisy.
 
I don't know how you guys keep track of all this shit.

We don't know how the U.S. Free Press does not cover it? The nightly news barely had it, but we get crying kids for nearly a 1/2 straight. An attack on the U.S. Presidency... meh... OMG!!! 2,000 kids are separated from the adults (maybe parents/maybe not) because they crossed the border illegally. The world is over. Time to cry on air.

Meanwhile, nuclear war was averted and the Korean War has ended.... meh x2.

We have a corrupt FBI / DoJ and U.S. Press. You should thank God for Fox News or no one would cover it with any veracity.
 
They can't comment on if the conclusions he found the Russian investigation were free from bias, since he was removed...because it was found out he was biased.

No. They looked his bias (one fucking text message that was clearly sent in jest), and stated very clearly that no actions were taken that were unusual, and that this one agents "bias" did not affect Mueller's decisions at all.

It's clear that your intent isn't to represent the IG report accurately, but to broaden it into the realm of baseless conjecture so that you can dismiss the Special Counsel's findings completely. No one surprised at this, it's what trump supporters have been doing for over a year.
 
lol

"So what that they were biased towards the people they investigated? Doesn't mean the investigation was biased!"

Fucking wow.

All you do is swing into threads, throw out some bullshit conclusion that no one is making, and dance about as if you're onto something. How the fuck you think you come off as a wise old man (you're younger than most of the regular non-partisan posters here) with this is beyond me.

What the IG investigation concluded, and what non-trumptwats are agreeing with, was that despite a text message there was no indication this agent or anyone else did anything unordinary with this "bias."

This may shock you, but other adults have opinions. These opinions can sometimes include political opinions. These political opinions might be spoken about privately. The question is whether any opinion affected the work that this person was doing was affected by it. The IG report give a big fat "no" to that question.

Do you have anything different, or do you just want to keep parroting partisan speculation?
 
Strzok should have been fired as soon as they found his texts saying he’d prevent trump from being president, while investigating both campaigns. No room for a guy like that of such weak character in the fbi.

I will not trust the FBI until I am confident that every one of its agents is a Trump loyalist. Maybe that dummy Comey would still have a job if he had vowed loyalty to Trump when he was asked to do so by the president.
 
I will not trust the FBI until I am confident that every one of its agents is a Trump loyalist. Maybe that dummy Comey would still have a job if he had vowed loyalty to Trump when he was asked to do so by the president.

There’s a differnence between being loyal to trump and beinf loyal to your commander in chief. That distinction was lost on Comey, who thought that if he couldn’t be loyal to trump then he couldn’t pledge loyalty to his commander in chief.
 
There’s a differnence between being loyal to trump and beinf loyal to your commander in chief. That distinction was lost on Comey, who thought that if he couldn’t be loyal to trump then he couldn’t pledge loyalty to his commander in chief.
The loyalty is to the constitution, and the rule of law. Something Trump knows nothing about.
 
You must not have heard.... The IG report was a nothing burger and Trump is putting brown kids in concentration camps.

Russia investigation, obstruction, etc. is so last week
Good.<Moves>
Less little mexican kids running around acting a fool while I'm trying to eat at restaurants. Future cholos. I dislike cholos.
 
There’s a differnence between being loyal to trump and beinf loyal to your commander in chief. That distinction was lost on Comey, who thought that if he couldn’t be loyal to trump then he couldn’t pledge loyalty to his commander in chief.

"Look, Jim. I'm not asking you to pledge loyalty to Donald Trump. I'm asking you to pledge loyalty to president Donald Trump." - POTUS
 
You posted a mix mash of stuff there. And your source is conflating 2 different things.

But even then they at least got the end right.

And your original post said the IG found NO bias by Strzok. Even your flimsy source you provided disagrees with your original post

No political bias on the work he was doing with the FBI, that’s what the IG states. Are you honestly saying that because someone has political bias; which everyone in DC has, that they are excluded from investigating a person from the opposing party? What the IG says is that considering his political bias it cast a shadow on the E-mail investigation. I am all for a deeper dive to see if something nefarious was done but given the information we have today I don’t see how you can come to that conclusion unless you are letting emotions drive you.

Benghazi investigation was conducted by Republicans, should we had let only Democrates do the investigation? The fact that nothing illegal against Clinton came from the investigation means more considering the other party are the ones doing the investigation.
 
After working directly on both the Clinton and trump investigations, he said he would stop trump from becoming president. This txt was also concealed by the doj during two prior info dumps on the basis that it would compromise sources and methods and even put lives in danger, it only came out in the IG report.

Here are some examples of the txt messages between FBI agents:

August 16, 2015, Strzok: “[Bernie Sanders is] an idiot like Trump. Figure they cancel each other out.”

February 12, 2016, Page: “I’m no prude, but I’m really appalled by this. So you don’t have to go looking (in case you hadn’t heard),
Trump called him the p-word. The man has no dignity or class. He simply cannot be president.

February 12, 2016, Strzok: “Oh, [Trump’s] abysmal. I keep hoping the charade will end and people will just dump him. The problem, then, is Rubio will likely lose to Cruz. The Republican party is in utter shambles. When was the last competitive ticket they offered?”

March 3, 2016, Page: “God trump is a loathsome human.”

March 3, 2016, Strzok: “Omg [Trump’s] an idiot.

March 3, 2016, Page:“He’s awful.”

March 3, 2016, Strzok: “God Hillary should win 100,000,000-0.”

March 3, 2016, Page: “Also did you hear [Trump] make a comment about the size of his d*ck earlier? This man cannot be president.”

March 12, 2016: Page forwarded an article about a “far right” candidate in Texas, stating, “[W]hat the f is wrong with people?” Strzok replied, “That Texas article is depressing as hell. But answers how we could end up with President trump.”

March 16, 2016, Page: “I cannot believe Donald Trump is likely to be an actual, serious candidate for president.”

June 11, 2016, Strzok: “They fully deserve to go, and demonstrate the absolute bigoted nonsense of Trump.”

July 18, 2016, Page: “...Donald Trump is an enormous d*uche.”

July 19, 2016, Page: “Trump barely spoke, but the first thing out of his mouth was ‘we’re going to win soooo big.’The whole thing is like living in a bad dream.”

July 21, 2016, Strzok: “Trump is a disaster. I have no idea how destabilizing his Presidency would be.”

Lisa Page text to Peter Strzok: “(Trump’s) not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”

Strzok: “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.”

And:

Strzok: “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in [Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s] office—that there’s no way [Trump] gets elected—but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40…”

What does this mean, I am afraid we can’t take that risk? It means we can’t just sit around and let whatever happens happen. We can’t take the risk. We’ve got to do something. And, boy, did they. Working with Fusion GPS, manufacturing the Trump dossier which was used to get a FISA warrant to investigate and surveil the Trump campaign.

Based on the above investigation, code-named Crossfire Hurricane, a special prosecutor was established. The special prosecutor has brought indictments against two Trump campaign staffers for crimes unrelated to the campaign, Flynn for lying to the FBI and Manafort for wire fraud relating to work done many years ago. The purpose of these indictments is to turn witnesses against Trump. They even went so far as to raid Trump's lawyer's office.

The purpose of all of this is to remove Trump from office. What this means is the American people are not able to vote for a democratically elected leader if the employees of the government disapprove of that leader. Now some people agree with this. Some people trust the authorities to make better decisions than the masses. After all, throughout human history, democracy is the exception and not the rule. But in a democratic republic, such as the united states, the people are supposed to be the highest authority over the government and not the other way around. These FBI agents had a job to do and that was serve the American public, not govern or make decisions for the public. But they thought they knew better, thus demonstrating the height of arrogance, entitlement, breach of trust, and abuse of authority.

Thanks for posting all of those text messages that clearly show a man who thought Trump was a con man. What those text messages don’t show is how Strzok fabricated the Russian propaganda, Trump lying about the tower meeting or his involvement, the myriad of Russian intel agents with ties to almost everyone in his campaign and the numerous indictments, guilty pleas and the people who are now giving info to the SC.

When you can show me how Strzok did all of this then I’ll believe there was political bias on his part and the whole Russia/Trump thing is a witch hunt.
 
Thanks for posting all of those text messages that clearly show a man who thought Trump was a con man. What those text messages don’t show is how Strzok fabricated the Russian propaganda, Trump lying about the tower meeting or his involvement, the myriad of Russian intel agents with ties to almost everyone in his campaign and the numerous indictments, guilty pleas and the people who are now giving info to the SC.

When you can show me how Strzok did all of this then I’ll believe there was political bias on his part and the whole Russia/Trump thing is a witch hunt.



Are you still pretending these indictments have anything to do with the trump campaign working with Russia?


Your desperation is embarrassing.
 
Back
Top