Crime TX man murders BLM protestor. Abbot vows to pardon murderer ASAP

[KAZSoliloquy]

racist undertones is a hilarious way to describe someone openly saying the n-word

 

[Bob Gray]

Yes, more of the latter. Do you think it is relevant that Perry is a racist as it applies to this case? Seems very relevant to me.

Why would racism be relevant in a case where a white man shoots a white man in a crowd of almost all white people?

 

[essie]

BLM ravaged his favorite salon so it's okay to shoot a random protestor obviously.

racist undertones is a hilarious way to describe someone openly saying the n-word

This is really my concern at the moment. I don't feel like there is a reason to placate an argument saying what Perry did was justified, but the troubling thing is the erosion of just a basic understanding that not only is racism wrong but reporting on it is right. I feel like every year we get further and further away from those rather obvious points, and now it is like we have an example of someone calling Black people monkeys, using the n word, talking about drowning his daughter if she dates a Black person and the right's reaction is it's wrong for the media to report this or Perry is being smeared. Even ten years ago I feel like a sane rightist would be able to go, okay yeah that's really, really bad. Now it seems as if the mere act of condemning racism is considered bad by the right, or it is "woke". This is very dangerous imo.

 

[essie]

Why would racism be relevant in a case where a white man shoots a white man in a crowd of almost all white people?

Because his motives for targeting a protest about Black lives mattering.

 

[Spetsnaz77]

This is really my concern at the moment. I don't feel like there is a reason to placate an argument saying what Perry did was justified, but the troubling thing is the erosion of just a basic understanding that not only is racism wrong but reporting on it is right. I feel like every year we get further and further away from those rather obvious points, and now it is like we have an example of someone calling Black people monkeys, using the n word, talking about drowning his daughter if she dates a Black person and the right's reaction is it's wrong for the media to report this or Perry is being smeared. Even ten years ago I feel like a sane rightist would be able to go, okay yeah that's really, really bad. Now it seems as if the mere act of condemning racism is considered bad by the right, or it is "woke". This is very dangerous imo.

Your point is valid; however, I think the crux is the instant jump to the race card sans any reasonable evidence of such.

 

[BIKES!]

Yes, more of the latter. Do you think it is relevant that Perry is a racist as it applies to this case? Seems very relevant to me.

Why on earth would it matter in a case where race wasn't involved?

 

[essie]

Your point is valid; however, I think the crux is the instant jump to the race card sans any reasonable evidence of such.

This is kind of my problem here. I usually see things as racist that people on the right don't, and while that bothers me I can at least understand that not everyone is going to have my worldview. In this case Perry's racism is just so blatant that having to argue it is worrisome. We have to at least be able to acknowledge this.

 

[KAZSoliloquy]

Why would racism be relevant in a case where a white man shoots a white man in a crowd of almost all white people?

because the white man was there protesting against racism lmao and that’s deliberately why perry, the racist, went there to instigate

 

[essie]

Why on earth would it matter in a case where race wasn't involved?

I disagree with you but I'm glad I was at least able to get an answer.

 

[BIKES!]

Because his motives for targeting a protest about Black lives mattering.

No. It was a terrorist group that has caused billions of dollars in damages across the country that he was upset about. Whatever the terrorist group claims their goal or name is doesn't matter. If the KKK changed their name to BLM it wouldn't change what they actually are. To imply he was against a concept is ridiculous, disingenuous and shows your racism... once again.

 

[essie]

No. It was a terrorist group that has caused billions of dollars in damages across the country that he was upset about. Whatever the terrorist group claims their goal or name is doesn't matter. If the KKK changed their name to BLM it wouldn't change what they actually are. To imply he was against a concept is ridiculous, disingenuous and shows your racism... once again.

I'm perfectly comfortable with you thinking what I say is ridiculous, disingenuous and racist. This shows me I am on the right track. Thank you.

 

[KAZSoliloquy]

No. It was a terrorist group that has caused billions of dollars in damages across the country that he was upset about. Whatever the terrorist group claims their goal or name is doesn't matter. If the KKK changed their name to BLM it wouldn't change what they actually are. To imply he was against a concept is ridiculous, disingenuous and shows your racism... once again.

actually, any sort of violence that occurred in BLM protests were completely concocted by the Feds, and the real people involved in the protest would never do such a thing.

you know, like you said about Jan 6th.

 

[Andy Capp]

Leftists: Need to make sure the armed mob that falsely imprisoned an Uber driver on public property had the gun pointed dead in his eyes and finger on the trigger

Same leftist: unarmed Ashli Babbit escorted into an unsecured building deserved to get shot in the face


Sounds about left

it's textbook selective morality.

if this was a bunch of Proud boys surrounding a member of the LGBT community in their vehicle, minding their own business , and one of the proud boys postured up with a rifle and got lit up, the very same people in this thread making up lies and narratives would be singing a completely different tune.

it would be more like, "well, he fucked around and found out..." or "duuuur, Darwin award recipient."

it's morality contingent on the political affiliation of the those involved.

I'll take posts that aged well for $2000, Alex.

In this document, see pages 36-~42 for example, the murderer lays out in clear detail how he intends to create a reasonable defense for murder despite clear intent/malice-aforethought.

Page 38 of 76
MICHAEL HOLCOMB: “What was the guy doing before that though? If he wasdriving into protestors or threatening them with his gun (some people have beenrecorded doing this) then he may have incited violence.”

Perry goes on to question and to look for ways where he could plausibly deny intent to incite a confrontation with a lot of "but what ifs".

Please see below for easier reference.

page 19 of these documents filed by travis county prosecutors
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/po...ry-messages-violent-racist-posts-17896036.php

 

[Andy Capp]

Leftists: Need to make sure the armed mob that falsely imprisoned an Uber driver on public property had the gun pointed dead in his eyes and finger on the trigger

Same leftist: unarmed Ashli Babbit escorted into an unsecured building deserved to get shot in the face


Sounds about left

it's textbook selective morality.

if this was a bunch of Proud boys surrounding a member of the LGBT community in their vehicle, minding their own business , and one of the proud boys postured up with a rifle and got lit up, the very same people in this thread making up lies and narratives would be singing a completely different tune.

it would be more like, "well, he fucked around and found out..." or "duuuur, Darwin award recipient."

it's morality contingent on the political affiliation of the those involved.

I'll take posts that aged well for $2000, Alex.

In this document, see pages 36-~42 for example, the murderer lays out in clear detail how he intends to create a reasonable defense for murder despite clear intent/malice-aforethought.


Page 38 of 76
MICHAEL HOLCOMB: “What was the guy doing before that though? If he wasdriving into protestors or threatening them with his gun (some people have beenrecorded doing this) then he may have incited violence.”

Perry goes on to question and to look for ways where he could plausibly deny intent to incite a confrontation with a lot of "but what ifs".

Please see below for easier reference.

page 19 of these documents filed by travis county prosecutors
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/po...ry-messages-violent-racist-posts-17896036.php

 

[Edmond_Dantes]

I'll take posts that aged well for $2000, Alex.

In this document, see pages 36-~42 for example, the murderer lays out in clear detail how he intends to create a reasonable defense for murder despite clear intent/malice-aforethought.


Page 38 of 76
MICHAEL HOLCOMB: “What was the guy doing before that though? If he wasdriving into protestors or threatening them with his gun (some people have beenrecorded doing this) then he may have incited violence.”

Perry goes on to question and to look for ways where he could plausibly deny intent to incite a confrontation with a lot of "but what ifs".

Please see below for easier reference.

I haven't had time to peruse these documents.

but if what you're implying is true, this does alter my opinion on the matter. it does appear he was looking for conflict.

 

[Phisher]

LOL This fucking guy is a groomer too?




I'm sure Abbott is loving the fact that he got bullied into supporting this piece of shit by Tucker Carlson and a bunch of idiots on social media.

 

[Limbo Pete]

I haven't had time to peruse these documents.

but if what you're implying is true, this does alter my opinion on the matter. it does appear he was looking for conflict.

He discussed his plan for finding a way to "legally" kill someone, how to conserve ammo, only shooting people at the front, etc. and then characterized his own approach here as a "tactic". He also qualified his own apparent understanding of this tactic by noting that he didn't intend to even let anyone "near him or his car" at all. Considering all of that, and the fact that he refused to yield a light and drove into a crowd and then shot someone that had, a second prior, told him to "move on" (according to witnesses), I just don't know how a sane, rational human being could reach any other conclusion than premediated murder. On top of all that, the jury apparently didn't even have access to most of this, and convicted him on far less damning social media content that was made available to them.

 

[Andy Capp]

All the info is all over the internet yet the DA excluded it or wouldn’t admit it. Interesting Foster on record citing his violent intents as part of a terrorist group and the violence leading up to him assaulting Perry weren’t admitted?

NPCs don’t want facts or a judicial system.

LMAO still asserting it's up to the DA to say that evidence introduced during discovery is deemed inadmissible to the jury? Are you sure about that, Mr. clear-minded independent thinker and totally not an NPC? You might want to ask a your dad how that basic shit works, clown shoes. I mean, honest to fuck, put down the pipe and try to think about it for just a second, dim bulb.

 

[Andy Capp]

LOL This fucking guy is a groomer too?




I'm sure Abbott is loving the fact that he got bullied into supporting this piece of shit by Tucker Carlson and a bunch of idiots on social media.

There are at least three separate instances of similar exchanges in that document.

 

[BIKES!]

I'll take posts that aged well for $2000, Alex.

In this document, see pages 36-~42 for example, the murderer lays out in clear detail how he intends to create a reasonable defense for murder despite clear intent/malice-aforethought.


Page 38 of 76
MICHAEL HOLCOMB: “What was the guy doing before that though? If he wasdriving into protestors or threatening them with his gun (some people have beenrecorded doing this) then he may have incited violence.”

Perry goes on to question and to look for ways where he could plausibly deny intent to incite a confrontation with a lot of "but what ifs".

Please see below for easier reference.

You can find the quotes about Garret Foster glorifying him being ready for war and the people he victimizes with his AR won't do anything about it. Your type used to call it play stupid games or something...