- Joined
- Oct 25, 2013
- Messages
- 23,412
- Reaction score
- 17,458
because no one cared about after that.Oh nevermind then.
Not sure why but I was sure Brock Headlined
because no one cared about after that.Oh nevermind then.
Not sure why but I was sure Brock Headlined
No but aldo is not conor
If the idea is that Connor was the better pick for getting the shot, he never defended either belt once. And cherry picking Aldo as some unreliable champ is odd considering there are a ton of other champs that were difficult to work with - Jones for one.C'mon man, Aldo isn't a PPV headliner at this point he hasn't fought in the UFC in years. Pantoja is a defending champion. Of course he's going to headline the card.
Aldo has always been treated MORE than fairly. He never got the LW title shot because he's unreliable. this cannot be debated, there is no long reigning champ that is less reliable than Aldo. He pulled out of events CONSTANTLY (caused the Second Event cancellation of all time) during his title reign, Can't imagine why they would EVER want someone like that to have one title. Let alone two.
Aldo definitely could beat some LW champs like Pettis and AlvarezHe defended 5x. Aldo defended the belt 9x if you count the WEC.
Max could move up in weight and hang with the top from LW while Aldo was forced to move down from FW to go for the title.
Max has a bigger frame and is 5 years younger... him beating Aldo takes nothing away from Aldo's FW greatness
Hindsight is irrelevent.If the idea is that Connor was the better pick for getting the shot, he never defended either belt once.
This, exactly.They are promoters first and foremost, don't take it personally and I highly doubt Aldo does either. Just marketing going on that is all.