No, 2 judges gave Valentina 3 rounds and Alexa 2. It was a draw b/c of a ridiculous 10-8 score. If the fight had been scored correctly without the 10-8 it would have gone to Valentina.
I never said he was consistent. I just posted the link where he describes the rule changes. Most fans and even judges still think the 10-8 score is reserved for total dominance where one fighter is so superior for the whole round the other fighter can't do anything. Even Val said it in her post-fight interview. Consistency in scoring is lacking across the board with all the judges.
No it wasnt, but shes either right or Bell was paid off....likely the latter though.She's always salty but that wasn't a "race card"
that makes no sense.. if he scored it right valentina wins... if your gonna score a 10-8 . valentina was closer to submitting alexa the the revers by a mile.. so that round deserved a 10-8 more then the 5th.. Valentina won that fight plain and simple.. busted grasso up ..
Um Grasso was equally full of herself celebrating a draw like W and dismissing the bs 10-8 like she deserved it lol.She's getting more and more arrogant so seeing her not getting the belt is great
She's becoming more salty too
Fair enough and I do agree.
It feels like when judges are inconsistent week to week, I can chalk it up to "points of emphasis" from the commissions or whatever.
It feels like when judges are inconsistent fight to fight on the same night, I can chalk it up to incompetence.
But when judges are inconsistent in their criteria round to round, it sure feels like they are trying to get to a certain result (meaning, idk about rigged but I think there could be some 'I think the fight was a draw, so how do I get it there' logic going on).
thisRound 5 wasn’t a 10-8 round
you could make an argument Grasso won. But that wasn’t a 10-8 round.
I bet on grasso but vals mounted guillotine was the closest thing to a finish in that fight val got dropp but for like 0.5 seconds she was back standing and got a take down almost right after.Lolololol. Round 2 says otherwise. Val was like 3 strikes away from getting tko'd.
I didnt know how dumb and delusional these val faanbois are
Her legacy is being queen of the soccer moms.Well …..she did win that as well ….. shit judges fucking my legacy wouldn’t make me happy
An elbow can cause damage, but the elbow from shev was not damaging. It cut her but Grasso was never hurt or 'damaged' from the elbow. Getting put on your ass, is damaging. Getting kneed in the head is damaging. Getting your head dribbled off the mat is damage.
You're conflating two issues: incompetent/corrupt judges and the scoring system not accurately reflecting what happened in the fight. Judging the fight as a whole would make the first issue much worse. Using more than 2 points to judge a round would be much better than just throwing out the scoring criteria and giving bad judges even less accountability.I've been posting about how the 10pt system is bad for MMA for years. I don't see any fix for it which is why I always advocate for judging fights as a whole. There would still be disagreements and debate but not like there is now where people over-analyze individual rounds of 5 round fights. It's just too subjective when a light-hitting, do nothing round can be judged the same as one where there is a knockdown or a lot of damage occurs.