- Joined
- Jul 5, 2012
- Messages
- 42,581
- Reaction score
- 13,768
Damn - I guess when you've been training since you were a kid you've basically put in the time to be at that level.
Damn - I guess when you've been training since you were a kid you've basically put in the time to be at that level.
Blue is the highest you can acheive as a child...
The Ruotolos would murder your average hobbyist black belt.Those kids are good as I've seen previously, but nothing in that video makes me think black belt. They seem to be just playing around. In actuality they can likely compete well vs purple and browns.
Also yes,the IBJJF belt system is garbage. Age doesn't matter if you have the ability. You'll never see anyone over the age of 20 win at blue belt at Worlds again. Kids with 8-10 years of training have a massive advantage over a guy that starts at age 22 and has 3 years training.
Lol. And there's the start of another "today's blue belts are better than black belts" discussion. Ugh.The Ruotolos would murder your average hobbyist black belt.
Competing at black belt against roided out grown man while you are still a teenager is a different thing.
been saying this for a long time, its ridiculous that guys that have been grappling for over 10 years are "blue belts" these kids must comepete as blue belts beause of their age, yet some random dude whos been traing for 2 yeatrs have to go agasint this "kids" who have more mat time than 99% of hobbiest black belts, its ridiculous.
That is basically what I mean - Obviously they were not going 100% but they were still fluid and smooth as can be. And they would beat the average hobbyist/older BB.The Ruotolos would murder your average hobbyist black belt.
Competing at black belt against roided out grown man while you are still a teenager is a different thing.
Not really - no one other than you is bringing that up.Lol. And there's the start of another "today's blue belts are better than black belts" discussion. Ugh.
You think that 99% of blackbelts are frauds? That's one heck of a claim.Can we just call that 99% what they are? Socially promoted frauds?
You think that 99% of blackbelts are frauds? That's one heck of a claim.
I believe the current ibjjf rules have like a gray belt for kids and when they turn 16 their instructor can give them blue or purple at the instructor's discretion.Blue is the highest you can acheive as a child. I understand the thinking that is behind this when they made it, but IMO it's outdated and doesn't seem to be working well. On the one hand they don't want a bunch of kid blackbelts that can't really fight, but now there are kids that at 15 or 16 are as good or better than world champions. In some cases it could be the kids are young and have strength, speed, flexibility, etc on their side, but often times their actual knowledge of Bjj is as good or better than most blackbelts.
With people starting earlier and better instruction, someone with 10 years of experience can be really good. They might not have a black belt, but IMO they are masters of BJJ. IMHO the belt system needs to be revised.
I believe the current ibjjf rules have like a gray belt for kids and when they turn 16 their instructor can give them blue or purple at the instructor's discretion.
I could definitely be mistaken, though
Lol. And there's the start of another "today's blue belts are better than black belts" discussion. Ugh.
Not really - no one other than you is bringing that up.
Suffering from short term memory loss?That is basically what I mean - Obviously they were not going 100% but they were still fluid and smooth as can be. And they would beat the average hobbyist/older BB.
Damn - I guess when you've been training since you were a kid you've basically put in the time to be at that level.