'white nuclear family' promotes white supremacy, says New York professor

[Cuauhtemoc]

1.- Alt-right is not just against political correctness or "saying it like it is", it also couples white nationalism, protectionism, racialism among other things.

I think there are two similar but distinct movements. There are anti-PC people that used to call themselves alt-right too and the real alt-right(Spencer and friends).
The first one, also called Alt-lite, are a much bigger group and were inspired in part by the real alt right but also by american nationalism and conservatism.
They started to dissociate with that name after Spencer and friends went full fash with the heilgate and associating with neonazis(by neonazis I mean Hitlerists that wear swastikas).
Spencer is dumb as fuck, he destroyed his own trademark with these reckless actions.
See how beautiful it was when Christians(jesus will judge you), Identitarians and even a black patriot(with the MAGA hat and stick) fought together against communists.

After associating with neonazis:

only the mentally impaired NEETs remained

 

[Deleted member 457759]

What a stupid cunt.

 

[WiolentOne]

Then it is doomed to failure.

In the context of America - common ideas.

And actually, it's the reason why we are number 1 in the world, while Europe is going down the shitter.

 

[Rod1]

In the context of America - common ideas.

And actually, it's the reason why we are number 1 in the world, while Europe is going down the shitter.

250 years of bipartidism tells me you are lying.

 

[Mark Hunts FIST]

The only benefit to this craziness is, it's hard to imagine the Democrats winning another general election.

They are bat shit crazy, these days. And they're so scared of offending their other batshit crazy people, they don't say anything. I love it

 

[WiolentOne]

250 years of bipartidism tells me you are lying.

All united under the foundational document we call the constitution.

 

[unimackpass]

Yes, a sociology professor at a community college means that its not hitting mainstream.

She isn't alone in her pursuit.

There is a element of not just anti white but also of man hating here according this black man (that wrote this article).

Also don't forget what a "fringe" movement is doing to Canada, just ask Peterson.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/28/black-lives-matters-real-agenda/

“Black Lives Matter is a radical social intervention.”

That’s a direct quote from Black Lives Matter’s website.

While the media have typically focused on Black Lives Matter’s assertions of societal racism and systemic police brutality, they have largely ignored the movement’s LGBTQ agenda.

One of the “guiding principles” of Black Lives Matter states: “We are committed to…doing the work required to dismantle cis-gender privilege and uplift Black trans folk…”



Another principle explains: “We are committed to fostering a queer-affirming network. When we gather, we do so with the intention of freeing ourselves from the tight grip of heteronormative thinking or, rather, the belief that all in the world are heterosexual unless s/he or they disclose otherwise.”


Yet Black Lives Matter’s LGBTQ agenda extends far beyond normalizing all permutations of sexuality. Black Lives Matter also advocates redefining the family.

“We are committed to disrupting the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and ‘villages’ that collectively care for one another, and especially ‘our’ children to the degree that mothers, parents and children are comfortable,” the group states.

The fact that so many otherwise well-informed Americans remain unaware of Black Lives Matter’s goal to revolutionize the structure of society proves the media consistently fails to report the entirety of BLM’s goals and agenda.

Describing Opal Tometi, Alicia Garza and Patrisse Cullors, the founders of the movement, the Black Lives Matter website says, “all are U.S.-based black feminists, all are seasoned organizers, Cullors and Garza identify as queer…”

Cullors says on her website, “I am happy I have an amazing partner who is queer and trans and Black and brilliant.” Her biography identifies her as, “A self-described wife of Harriet Tubman.

 

[Denter]

You got a source for that? Not that its hard to believe, I just like having a source for fun facts like that.

Reminds me of a friend of mine that adamantly claims lesbian sex isn't real sex.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lesbian_bed_death

I can dig up the studies from that medical study summary place if you give me time.

Fun fact, 42% of homosexual men admit to being sexually assaulted as children.

 

[Rod1]

All united under the foundational document we call the constitution.

Which is a liberal document.

 

[unimackpass]

I know 2 married lesbian couples that are raising kids in a monogamous relationships and they are also religious. The woman is fat and bitter, thats to be expected of said peple

Social sciences will always have fringe views, that doesnt makes them mainstream.

If gay people are so much against, marriage i wonder why have they fought so hard for the right to marry. And if conservatives are in favor of marriage, why have they opposed the right to marry for many groups.

Gay people wanting to marry purposely weakens the institution of marriage and it's why conservatives have resisted it. The free love hippies hated having to get a piece of paper to get married. Why all of a sudden it's all the rage for gays? Easy math.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2012/05/gay_marriage_the_hidden_agenda.html

Aside from the tremendous damage same-sex marriage does to the well-being and normal development of children, by offering an alternative to a bedrock institution, gay marriage calls into question all traditional values. There is a strong correlation between the rise of homosexual marriage and the weakening of traditional matrimony. David Blankenhorn observes, "The deep logic of same-sex marriage is clearly consistent with what scholars call deinstitutionalization -- the overturning or weakening of all of the customary forms of marriage, and the dramatic shrinking of marriage's public meaning and institutional authority. Does deinstitutionalization necessarily require gay marriage? Apparently not. For decades heterosexuals have been doing a fine job on that front all by themselves. But gay marriage clearly presupposes and reinforces deinstitutionalization."

Marx's loyal cohort Friedrich Engels, in his influential work, The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the States, disclosed the game plan in a single, succinct proposition: change the concept of matrimony, and the traditional family will cease to exist.And once the family is gone, society will fall apart. Knock out the cornerstone, and the whole edifice will crumble, which is precisely the ultimate goal of the revolutionary movement.



Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/05/gay_marriage_the_hidden_agenda.html#ixzz4xDWK2Qn9
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

 

[fartJokes]

Which is a liberal document.

LOL. You get a participation trophy for that argument. But hey, you got a trophy! Feels almost like winning for real, yeah?

 

[Jorge Luis Borges]

the white-nuclear family is one of the most powerful forces supporting white supremacy

The nuclear family is a powerful social structure. The breakdown of the black nuclear family explains the failures of American blacks more comprehensively than current white racism does. I think more black families with two married parents are needed if we want to see young black men and women perform better in life.

As far as white supremacy goes, the only racist I see here is this stupid professor. It's hard to blame anti-intellectuals when so-called intellectuals are saying this kind of thing more and more often.

 

[Rod1]

LOL. You get a participation trophy for that argument. But hey, you got a trophy! Feels almost like winning for real, yeah?

I dont get it.

 

[Rod1]

Gay people wanting to marry purposely weakens the institution of marriage and it's why conservatives have resisted it. The free love hippies hated having to get a piece of paper to get married. Why all of a sudden it's all the rage for gays? Easy math.

So gays are by definition hippies?

 

[Greoric]

Her specifically? I don't know. I don't know her.

My entire point is that it doesn't make sense, I can't be expected to make sense of something I think makes no sense.

But you're assuming she has a larger more esoteric point... why can't she just be read at face value and be a goof?

 

[ripskater]

The nuclear family is a powerful social structure. The breakdown of the black nuclear family explains the failures of American blacks more comprehensively than current white racism does. I think more black families with two married parents are needed if we want to see young black men and women perform better in life.

As far as white supremacy goes, the only racist I see here is this stupid professor. It's hard to blame anti-intellectuals when so-called intellectuals are saying this kind of thing more and more often.

 

[unimackpass]

So gays are by definition hippies?

You must have bin good at dodgeball.

The obvious point being made is everything counter culture resisted the "institution" of marriage because it represented "oppressive tradition" and then it became all the rage to become part of it. Easy math.

 

[Rod1]

You must have bin good at dodgeball.

The obvious point being made is everything counter culture resisted the "institution" of marriage because it represented "oppressive tradition" and then it became all the rage to become part of it. Easy math.

Since when are gays part of counter-culture? homosexuality has existed since the times of the Bible.

Also the same argument was also said of interracial marriages plenty of times.

Are you against interracial marriage?

 

[Jorge Luis Borges]

Since when are gays part of counter-culture? homosexuality has existed since the times of the Bible.

Also the same argument was also said of interracial marriages plenty of times.

Are you against interracial marriage?

Gays are generally considered a counter culture because until relatively recently, homosexuality was not accepted by the mainstream culture. The fact that homosexuality has always existed is irrelevant.

I've never heard that argument made against interracial marriages, but I believe you. My response would be that when the same argument is made against two different things, it does not follow that the argument is wrong in both cases, even if it is wrong in one.

 

[Rod1]

Gays are generally considered a counter culture because until relatively recently, homosexuality was not accepted by the mainstream culture. The fact that homosexuality has always existed is irrelevant.

I've never heard that argument made against interracial marriages, but I believe you..

So historical persecution makes someone part of the counter-culture? Are jews counter-culture? are blacks counter-culture?

My response would be that when the same argument is made against two different things, it does not follow that the argument is wrong in both cases, even if it is wrong in one.

Indeed, but you need to explain why A is different than B, since im using the very same logic.