Draw and/or Wilder are trolling votes. No wonder 90% of voters had Fury winning. He did and he won wide.
116-110, I guess I have it.
Ban the judge who had 115-111 Wilder. Seriously. No path to that score in my eyes.
You said a draw is justifiable, but then said he got robbed in your previous post. Which is it?
He was floored in two rounds. There were several rounds that were very close, by pretty much everyones account.
That right there says its a damn close fight.
Draw and/or Wilder are trolling votes. No wonder 90% of voters had Fury winning. He did and he won wide.
116-110, I guess I have it.
Ban the judge who had 115-111 Wilder. Seriously. No path to that score in my eyes.
Golovkin wasnt planted on his ass (or put out cold) twice either.Ggg vs golovkin we’re both close fights with tough rounds to score. I personally think the rounds were more clear cut in this fight.
I’m not claiming corruption or any shit like that, judges clearly score fights differently. Wilder fans are happy with the draw because deep down they know their man should’ve lost. But thats boxing.
Golovkin wasnt planted on his ass (or put out cold) twice either.
I said on the night of the fight I think the draw is the best case for Wilder and I stand by that. I also still say a wide score for Fury is ridiculous.
116-110 for Fury is as bad as the dip shit judge that had it wide for Wilder.
No i didn’t, I said it was just about/barely justifiable. On watching it again I can’t give wilder enough rounds for a draw. So yeah I do think it was a robbery.
A lot of people? Who....?How? 115-110 Fury is a totally resonable score that a lot of people had, 115-110 Wilder is insane.
A lot of people? Who....?
116-110 is hilariously wide and just ridiculous.Whoever scored the fight for Showtime had it 115-111 and if you go on /boxing on Reddit there are tons of media outlets that scored it 115-111. The most common scores from media outlets were 115-111 and 114-112 for Fury.
Saying 116-110 for Fury is as bad as 115-110 for Wilder is retarded as it's way off from how most people scored the fight and 116-110 is only 1-2 rounds different than most people's scoring.
115-110 Wilder is like 5 rounds off from what most people had.
Golovkin wasnt planted on his ass (or put out cold) twice either.
I said on the night of the fight I think the draw is the best case for Wilder and I stand by that. I also still say a wide score for Fury is ridiculous.
116-110 for Fury is as bad as the dip shit judge that had it wide for Wilder.
So a draw isn't justifiable, then?