- Joined
- Jun 14, 2009
- Messages
- 28,908
- Reaction score
- 15,212
You haven't yet disagreed with the statement "poverty in America is a lifestyle choice".
You keep mentioning third-world countries (which I haven't). I just mentioned that there is a global standard for the word poverty.
The figures you quoted are poverty neither by US standards nor absolute standards.
You are you using your own custom definition which seems to be: If you can only afford to support yourself month-to-month without much savings (rather than raise a family) then you are in poverty. Is that basically your definition?
I need to know how you are redefining poverty to understand what your point is.
I'm not redefining poverty at all, you just desperately need me to be doing so so you can peg it to "global poverty" and minimize it.
Why else would you be so hung up on the definition if the entire thread is based on a relative premise to begin with? Why am I mentioning third world countries? Because you apparently think global poverty somehow matters when we're discussing whether or not being fucking poor in the US is a life choice. I mean, it's amazing how daft you have to be. You apparently think having an income so low that you qualify for welfare isn't poverty based on "reasons" and "that's not what poverty means"!
Ok buddy, keep playing that hand, maybe someone else will fall for it.