I didn't forget him; he was on my mind when I wrote that, but I've always sort of stopped mentally classifying guys as "little men" when they hit 6'4" where they listed Westbrook for years. 6'4" and you stop being a "little man" to me. Of course this is arbitrarily defined with an eye to the NBA average heights, but it's also because you'd open the floodgates (guys like Barkley are now "little man dunkers" as he attested his true height to be 6'4" in his own autobiography).
The league average has held pretty steady at 6'7" for years (and that figure is an average for the inflated "with shoes" figures which adds about 1.5" on average). The average for a shooting guard in 2015 was right at 6'4". Westbrook's pre-draft measurements put him at 6'2.5" without shoes; the problem is that we only have measurements like this going back a little over a decade. Monta Ellis is pushing it himself. He was measured only a quarter inch shorter than that without shoes, so there's probably little genuine difference between him and Westbrook, but shit like that is just what happens when you set an arbitrary cutoff.
And arbitrary cutoffs are arbitrary enough even when you have a consistent data set. They listed Westbrook at 6'4" for years, and as is tradition, he shrinks. Now they have him at 6'3". Another guy that popped in the feed when I double-checked on the current official listing to see if the shrinking phenomenon did indeed occur was Steven Nash who was also listed at 6'3" during his career. Nash was considerably shorter & smaller than Westbrook (not even to mention Westbrook's very long arms which put his average standing reach more than an inch above the NBA average of those with the same height).
It's not I mind his inclusion, but it's tough to try to maintain a clean mental space when the NBA just runs willy-nilly with their height statistics. Thank God for transparency of Pre-Draft measurements in the contemporary era. Gonna put all this nonsense to bed.