'white nuclear family' promotes white supremacy, says New York professor

[Rod1]

I know and agree. That's why I said "as an aside..."

No, i dont think alt-right is a backlash against leftists, is more of an economic issue of a system stacked against young adults.

Thats why you see them gravitating towards socialism, whether it be a far right or far left version of it.

 

[Farmer Br0wn]

The "alt right" has existed since forever, far longer than this modern leftist insanity.

What the Hell, I'll bite.

How do you figure that the alt-right predates the scribblings of Karl Marx?

 

[Rod1]

So if Nazi's are paid by the government to indoctrinate young people in government supported schools should I be okay with it because it is not yet "the norm"? Many on the left are promoting anti-white racism and he is defending it by mocking concern about that.

It will never be the norm.

 

[Rod1]

What the Hell, I'll bite.

How do you figure that the alt-right predates the scribblings of Karl Marx?

Since when did Karl Marx said that there are 1000 genders?

 

[b-hop]

Liberals are not even try to hide at this moment their white hate.

 

[Fawlty]

So what she is doing is okay then?

She's a dope, and the people who publicize this to rile up white people are racist.

 

[Gunny]

What part of the alt-right is new?

No, i merely said that "alt-right" has become is popular among the millenials because most Americans werent exposed to said ideals until the advent of social media.

So I'll state for the record that you are disingenuously trying to brasen out a baseless point. Any honest person reading the thread understands this. It is every bit as easy for me to attach this wing nut professor to historical leftist impulses as it is for you to attach the alt right to historic fascists. That said, two new things about the alt-right are: it is in response to and directly set against political correctness and it is tactically based in social media/the internet. You'll reply that these are just new verses to an old song and I'll say the same about your nutty professor and we'll go around in circles...

 

[Farmer Br0wn]

Since when did Karl Marx said that there are 1000 genders?

So are you denying that Marxism is the very nexus of the Antifa "philosophy"?

 

[Rod1]

So I'll state for the record that you are disingenuously trying to brasen out a baseless point. Any honest person reading the thread understands this.

No, im not, you are the one trying to claim that a movement that has existed for decades just popped out of nowhere yesterday due to political correctness.

The term itself was coined by either Spencer (white nationalist) in 2010 to refer to white nationalism.

There was no such thing as BLM, tranny bathrooms, 100 genders in 2010 and its not like Spencer came up with his ideas out of thin air in 2010.

It is every bit as easy for me to attach this wing nut professor to historical leftist impulses as it is for you to attach the alt right to historic fascists.

Thats not what i am doing. Im not pegging them to ideas from the 1940s, but ideas from the late 70s up to the 2000s.

two new things about the alt-right are: it is in response to and directly set against political correctness and it is tactically based in social media/the internet.

You are trying to conflate means with the ideology.

1.- Alt-right is not just against political correctness or "saying it like it is", it also couples white nationalism, protectionism, racialism among other things.

2.- Social media is what made it mainstream, like with many other fringe ideologies. Again, you are conveying the means in which said information reaches you with the existence of the movement itself.

 

[Rod1]

So are you denying that Marxism is the very nexus of the Antifa "philosophy"?

This woman is antifa?

 

[IDL]

This woman is antifa?

They would be different sects of the same overarching religion.

 

[Rod1]

They would be different sects of the same overarching religion.

Except that Marx never talked about multi-gender theory.

 

[ocfightfan]

It will never be the norm.

I don't care. She should not be paid by the government to indoctrinate young people into her racist BS.

 

[IDL]

Except that Marx never talked about multi-gender theory.

That is also true. NeoMarxism is a reformulation of the original ideas to be applied to developed Western nations where an economic class revolt is impossible due to people being too wealthy. The old formula can't work when there is a large middle class. Now it is formulated around race, gender, and sexual identity primarily but at its core it's 'same shit different pile'

 

[ocfightfan]

She's a dope, and the people who publicize this to rile up white people are racist.

So what she is doing is okay then? Its the people that are letting people know about it that are the problem?

If David Duke got a professorship at a public university to teach his ideology would you feel the same way?

 

[Gunny]

No, im not, you are the one trying to claim that a movement that has existed for decades just popped out of nowhere yesterday due to political correctness.

The term itself was coined by either Spencer (white nationalist) in 2010 to refer to white nationalism.

There was no such thing as BLM, tranny bathrooms, 100 genders in 2010 and its not like Spencer came up with his ideas out of thin air in 2010.



Thats not what i am doing. Im not pegging them to ideas from the 1940s, but ideas from the late 70s up to the 2000s.



You are trying to conflate means with the ideology.

1.- Alt-right is not just against political correctness or "saying it like it is", it also couples white nationalism, protectionism, racialism among other things.

2.- Social media is what made it mainstream, like with many other fringe ideologies. Again, you are conveying the means in which said information reaches you with the existence of the movement itself.

Maybe you not being American is giving you an uninformed perspective but there is nothing you can say about the historic continuity of the alt-right that can't be said about this professor. I went to Boston University in the mid-90's and encountered all manner of lunacy that we now call SJW leftism. The professors of that time are now mostly in their 60's and this lady was one of their students - steeped in their post modernist nonsense. The difference isn't the substance of what they say but only how careful they need to be when saying it.

 

[Rod1]

That is also true. NeoMarxism is a reformulation of the original ideas to be applied to developed Western nations where a class revolt is impossible due to people being too wealthy. The old formula can't work when there is a large middle class.

So? if they reformulated anything, then it is new, im not claiming that white nationalism today is the same as it was in the 1940s, but its the same as it was in the late 70s-2000s

 

[IDL]

So? if they reformulated anything, then it is new, im not claiming that white nationalism today is the same as it was in the 1940s, but its the same as it was in the late 70s-2000s

It is a new version of an old ideology. A repackaged gift.

If that is what you are also trying to present the alt-right as, well I don't know. Seems the alt-right isn't a top-down implemented and financed ideological package. A reactionary thing perhaps, or something that is common to all peoples and cultures (ethno-nationalism) which can ebb and flow perhaps.

The biggest figure has been Milo though so I don't even know if that is the case.

 

[Rod1]

Maybe you not being American is giving you an uninformed perspective but there is nothing you can say about the historic continuity of the alt-right that can't be said about this professor. I went to Boston University in the mid-90's and encountered all manner of lunacy that we now call SJW leftism. The professors of that time are now mostly in their 60's and this lady was one of their students - steeped in their post modernist nonsense. The difference isn't the substance of what they say but only how careful they need to be when saying it.

So why didnt the alt-right popped up then if leftist lunacy has been going on forever?

Because the ideas of Richard Spencer can be traced back decades, to people like David Lane and the Order the ideas of white nationalism, the ZOG CT, Holocaust denial and the such.

 

[Rod1]

I don't care. She should not be paid by the government to indoctrinate young people into her racist BS.

I agree, not because she is "indocrinating" (absolutely nobody will change their mind in their class) but because its a waste of money.