- Joined
- Feb 12, 2011
- Messages
- 1,263
- Reaction score
- 227
Weidman has a better case than Gastelum. Rockhold has a better case than either.
How does Rockhold has a better case?
Weidman has a better case than Gastelum. Rockhold has a better case than either.
No it wasn't he looked awful against branch. it was easily his least impressive win in the UFC. and I'm a huge rockhold supporter.To Gastelum, he beat a washed up Bisping.
Rockhold last win was impressive
So Bisping, a former champion, is washed up?
And Branch, who barely squeaked the win in the UFC and tapped to strikes without even fighting (he admitted it) = impressive win?
Dude, you joined the forum in November.
Deactivate your account in December. MMA is not for you, sorry.
Bispings not even top 10 anymore.
I didn’t say Rockhold deserved a title shot for making someone sub to punches, just stated that it was impressive.
I actually think Kelvin would have a decent shot at boxing his face off, as long as he can avoid cage clinches, and any sort of ground fight.
Luke's boxing defense is horrid, but his kicks are deadly, and his ground game would be too much for the smaller, Gastelum. Also, Kelvin is about 2x faster than Luke as well, but Luke has the length, and ability to cover more ground.
Pick em fight, really.
He did gas early in fairness but I just think Rockhold is more inclined to have a shot than Gastlelum.No it wasn't he looked awful against branch. it was easily his least impressive win in the UFC. and I'm a huge rockhold supporter.
I actually think Kelvin would have a decent shot at boxing his face off, as long as he can avoid cage clinches, and any sort of ground fight.
Luke's boxing defense is horrid, but his kicks are deadly, and his ground game would be too much for the smaller, Gastelum. Also, Kelvin is about 2x faster than Luke as well, but Luke has the length, and ability to cover more ground.
Pick em fight, really.
So Bisping, a former champion, is washed up?
And Branch, who barely squeaked the win in the UFC and tapped to strikes without even fighting (he admitted it) = impressive win?
Dude, you joined the forum in November.
Deactivate your account in December. MMA is not for you, sorry.
Tough 1 to call but i see Kelvin clocking him.
Who you picking ?
I actually think Kelvin would have a decent shot at boxing his face off, as long as he can avoid cage clinches, and any sort of ground fight.
Luke's boxing defense is horrid, but his kicks are deadly, and his ground game would be too much for the smaller, Gastelum. Also, Kelvin is about 2x faster than Luke as well, but Luke has the length, and ability to cover more ground.
Pick em fight, really.
I don't disagree with that, but lets not pretend that rockhold's win over branch vs Gastelums win over bisping is what seals it up. Gastelums one fight streak is better.He did gas early in fairness but I just think Rockhold is more inclined to have a shot than Gastlelum.
I don't know man, I know Kelvin himself kinda said that but he came pretty close to stopping teh Chris. I know it's kind of a flash knockdown but if one of the follow up shots landed flush it could have been over.Don't waste a fight on KG. He gets smoke by any of the top 6.
KG get your diet together and get a top 5 win at WW.
I would think Rockhold would take it. Keep Gastelum at bay with his kicks, which are as you said deadly, get a clinch, take it to the ground and either pound him out or sub him. I would slightly favor Rockhold...Gastelum does have that puncher's chance.