The primary difference is not will to compete. We don't let men kill women in MMA because they lack the will to compete. lmao
You've misunderstood my post. I wasn't saying that women don't compete. I was just pointing out that, as a group, they don't compete very well. They lose chess matches because they are not as competitive as their male counterparts, not because they don't have the brainpower.
In a fight, yes they are generally weaker and slower, but they are also less inclined, when the shit hits the fan, to do what they must to win.
A fighter can get out of a fight at any time. A man is far more likely to keep fighting, even if he if getting his ass kicked, and a woman is far more likely to stop fighting as soon as things get hairy.
Men are far more likely to believe they can take damage and keep going. Women are far more likely to believe that a single hard shot is enough to debilitate them. These aren't socially constructed mindsets; they are hormone constructed mindsets.
Simply put, there are physiological differences that make women versus men competitions inherently unfair, but the biggest physiological difference (as in, testosterone level dictated) is that women fold. It's a bad look in MMA.
BUT none of that changes the fact that there are SOME women out there who can beat SOME men out there in a chess match, in a footrace, in a bench press competition, in a basketball game... and, yes, in a fight.
People who argue that this isn't so are morons.
