- Joined
- Nov 12, 2014
- Messages
- 29,308
- Reaction score
- 3,148
its never changed, theyve always been able to deduct reebok money
that said, if you wear the reebok kit in ring, you wear it in all your pressers etc and reebok are getting the coverage then you deserve the reebok money
if you do something while in the reebok gear that brings the company into disrepute or portrays reebok in a negative light (which is a irony in itself), then yes, they could deduct reebok money
taking away "reebok money" for non reebok related transgressions, that would be taking the piss
but, no this doesnt make them employees.. lol... just because a sponsor payment is dependant on conduct, thats common in both employee and private contractor relationships.. i sometimes wonder if sherdoggers even know what an employee is
that said, if you wear the reebok kit in ring, you wear it in all your pressers etc and reebok are getting the coverage then you deserve the reebok money
if you do something while in the reebok gear that brings the company into disrepute or portrays reebok in a negative light (which is a irony in itself), then yes, they could deduct reebok money
taking away "reebok money" for non reebok related transgressions, that would be taking the piss
but, no this doesnt make them employees.. lol... just because a sponsor payment is dependant on conduct, thats common in both employee and private contractor relationships.. i sometimes wonder if sherdoggers even know what an employee is
Last edited: