When you've already displaced Palestinians over decades, at some point explicitly against the ostensible policy of the British, its hard to get the Palestinians to feel like they're getting a fair deal even in 1949. In hindsight they should've accepted the deal since its better than anything they can get now but its not as if the slate was clean in 49, there were already serious grievances by then.
It really is a problem with no solution everyone will accept.
You are the one talking of it now and for a few freakin pages.
Many Palestinians don't mind a one state solution either. And given the fact that a two state solution is not really viable at this point I think trying to fit a square peg into a round hole is only going to make matters worse.
That you have been trolling a thread about Israelis murdering children and journalists in cold blood with two state solution nonsense.
What was the question?
Really? I hadn't heard of the Israelis doing it.
To be fair to Israel I believe the practice has been banned for a few years (although the Israel Defence Ministry did try to overturn the ban). But IDF still uses human shields, some soldiers were convicted of doing so (I don't know what they got, probably a slap on the wrist) and UN reports have concluded that both IDF and Hamas use human shields.
When the partition was proposed between 6-12% of land was Jewish owned the the first map is probably actually quite accurate, the bottom map is a proposed plan not reflective of population or land ownership. Zionist leaders openly admitted that getting half the land wasn't their aim but a step to getting all the land, they had gone from nothing to something in 40 years, of course they were going to accept it and of course the Palestinian leadership were going to be thinking hold on a minuteThat first map labeled Palestine is fake news bruh....
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Partition_Plan_for_Palestine
"The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and a Special International Regime for the city of Jerusalem. The Partition Plan, a four-part document attached to the resolution, provided for the termination of the Mandate, the progressive withdrawal of British armed forces and the delineation of boundaries between the two States and Jerusalem. Part I of the Plan stipulated that the Mandate would be terminated as soon as possible and the United Kingdom would withdraw no later than 1 August 1948.
...
The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6] Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division"
