Social Border Patrol Agents Apprehend Largest Group Ever Encountered

But but but much overstayed visas but but but muh graph from 2011 that says illegal crossings are declining

I don’t know why you guys even waste your time trying to convince posters like @Falsedawn @Trotsky and irrational. These people can’t comprehend that a wall is only a part of a system....and they certainly have never had to deal with one as an immigrant

L o fucking l at the I’ll climb, tunnel, fly over in a drone, or take a submarine crowd

I've forgotten more about security posture than you'll know in your entire fucking life.
 
https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/nation...ents-apprehend-largest-group-ever-encountered

For video footage of this encounter: https://www.dvidshub.net/feature/BPLargeGroups

For images of this encounter: https://www.flickr.com/gp/cbpphotos/SH5b53

Over 460,000 apprehensions at the southwest border this year alone not including the month of May. Groups coming in from some of the top 20 most dangerous countries in the world. At what point do we take this seriously and understand that it is not sustainable. Despite what the mainstream media says, this is not a manufactured "crisis." This is real and we need to fix this problem.

Building the wall limits the entry points. You can then spend more resources patrolling the weaker points. Pretty obvious stuff.
 
Because one is a monumental waste of money and resources that will have a negligible effect? Kind of like addressing climate change: we could invest billions in green technology and also invest billions in coordinating massive rain dances and prayer rituals to the sun, but only one of those would be a reasonable expenditure.

That's a terrible analogy. Border walls and manned border security are effective means of protection against illegal immigration. Rain dances and prayer rituals do literally nothing. Using the price of the wall as an argument against it has lost most of its steam, as it's a drop in the bucket when compared to U.S. spending and how much money illegal immigrants wind up costing U.S. tax payers. Saying a wall will have a negligible effect is false. Throughout history and in plenty of countries today, walls have been an effective way to protect borders.
 
Cuz nobody cared about Obama detaining children and separating families.

Now liberal 9th circuit judges have declared that trump can’t do that same thing.

All to hamstring trump. It hurts america. Lefties just don’t care. They aren’t full adults.
Obama's administration didn't seperate families to dissuade immigration the way Trump's is.
 
This is a liberal talking point that only works on total hacks. Israel's wall has reduced illegal immigration to ZERO.

EDIT: Hungary too.

Israel shoots people crossing their walls and they have a shitload of troops guarding it and constantly patrolling it.
 
Liberals are for open borders and actively encourage them to come here illegally.

nah, smart people agree that a wall will do nothing by itself. Nobody is for open borders, that's just a low iq talking point
 
Building the wall limits the entry points. You can then spend more resources patrolling the weaker points. Pretty obvious stuff.
And I agree with this too. It will be effective, but not 100% and a large encampment can hold and process those that make it through.
 
nah, smart people agree that a wall will do nothing. Nobody is for open borders, that's just a low iq talking point
Only low IQ people support politicians that are suggesting ICE should be shutdown, walls are immoral, existing walls should be torn down, and that the illegal aliens are actually "refugees".
 
But he did

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cb...ama-for-child-separation-policy-claim-review/

Notice how photos used to denounce trump are from 2014, when Obama was in office


Notice how nobody cared back then. They weren’t calling Obama a monster, all lefties media was too busy sucking Obama shaft. Playing guard dog for his Administration.
That article states this:
"But the president's claim that he ended a policy of separating migrant children instituted by Mr. Obama is false."
"While some migrant families were separated during the Obama and Bush administrations when immigration officials determined parents posed a risk to their children, there was no government policy of systematically separating children from their parents."

I didn't see the pictures, maybe they were in the video, but the ones I remember were "caged" families not separated children.
 
Only low IQ people support politicians that are suggesting ICE should be shutdown, walls are immoral, existing walls should be torn down, and that the illegal aliens are actually "refugees".

Some are refugees, walls are not immoral, ice should be allowed to operate, and existing walls should stay up. Boom.

Low iq people hate them all and think a wall would somehow stop immigrants from coming. Low iq people need a symbol and not a solution. The wall is simply your symbol. Also, low iq people put kids in cages and separate them from their parents
 
Liberals are for open borders and actively encourage them to come here illegally.

Hell yes! Open that border and let all of these fine folks in so we can have a Democratic government for the foreseeable future.

Hahah stupid ass talking point no liberal has ever agreed to.
 
Some are refugees, walls are not immoral, ice should be allowed to operate, and existing walls should stay up. Boom.

Low iq people hate them all and think a wall would somehow stop immigrants from coming. Low iq people need a symbol and not a solution. The wall is simply your symbol. Also, low iq people put kids in cages and separate them from their parents
Low iq people think a wall would be ineffective despite numerous examples of walls working. Low iq people don't understand that kids in cages thing was just a temporary processing center and has now become propaganda for the open borders crowd.
 
I am just amazed at how for the last 8 years there’s been a steady decline in the number of illegal border crossing. Then comes President Clown Car who has been pushing for this symbol of his Presidency and funny enough border crossings soar. If this tells anyone anything is that Trump is unfit to secure the border.
 
Or, big or, we could have people there to catch them as they come over. Or even betterer, use technology to do it.

Spending hundreds of billions of dollars to not even accomplish the main goal is asinine. That's a stupid reason to waste that money, among a host of stupid reasons money is being wasted, which is notable.

You know what's better then nothing? Something.

The libtard government opposed the wall budget, creating a shut down that lasted so long it exceeded the original budget for the wall, effectively costing the tax payers MORE then the wall and in the end you have nothing. So you spent the money. But you opted to spend it on a shut down of the government...instead of a wall. Grats?

4.5 billion or whatever to build a wall on the border to help border security do their jobs is nothing. It's peanuts. And I still suggest he would have had Mexico pay for it in a round about way through trade agreements and tariffs.
 
Low iq people think a wall would be ineffective despite numerous examples of walls working. Low iq people don't understand that kids in cages thing was just a temporary processing center and has now become propaganda for the open borders crowd.

Stupid prisons. Don't they know ladders and air planes have been invented?

1200px-New_Jersey_State_Prison.jpg
 
You know what's better then nothing? Something.

The libtard government opposed the wall budget, creating a shut down that lasted so long it exceeded the original budget for the wall, effectively costing the tax payers MORE then the wall and in the end you have nothing. So you spent the money. But you opted to spend it on a shut down of the government...instead of a wall. Grats?

4.5 billion or whatever to build a wall on the border to help border security do their jobs is nothing. It's peanuts. And I still suggest he would have had Mexico pay for it in a round about way through trade agreements and tariffs.

Something is not better than nothing if that something is exorbitantly expensive, a giant eyesore and ecological bomb, and doesn't even solve the core issue.

Y'all just don't understand that the "common sense" on the matter isn't actually correct. You're not freeing up resources for unprotected areas, you're just adding another control that you have to manage. And that takes time, money, and manpower that would better be spent on something worthy of the 21st century. The caveat to "Defense in Depth" is "so long as it's financially feasible and is necessary". We actually have standards for access controls, y'know.
 
Stupid prisons. Don't they know ladders and air planes have been invented?

1200px-New_Jersey_State_Prison.jpg

Man, that looks awfully short for 2000 miles.

And awfully flat to compensate for topography.

It's almost like access controls have to be tailored to the environment they're in.

{<hhh]
 
Low iq people think a wall would be ineffective despite numerous examples of walls working. Low iq people don't understand that kids in cages thing was just a temporary processing center and has now become propaganda for the open borders crowd.

Yes because every wall is the same. You guys want the symbol and that's what it's about. The wall will literally do NOTHING to stop the flow of immigrants into the country. You would rather sit on top of it and shoot people as they come across. That's how little life means to you pro life people lol
 
Back
Top