- Joined
- Jan 25, 2011
- Messages
- 5,603
- Reaction score
- 6,938
One website accidentally broke the reviewer embargo agreement and posted their review early and then quickly deleted it. They gave it a 1.5 out of 5.
Sophie and dude from Ready Player One weren't the problem at all. The movie overall was just bad. Apocalypse himself was a ludicrous bungling of an iconic villain. But there were other issues too. The character interactions, the plotting, the pacing.
Translation - Its better than 'Apocalypse.'
The trailers made it look much worse. The last stand wasn't that terrible, everybody just hated on it because it ruined a couple beloved characters.. Understandably.wow this is supposed to be worse than last stand how did they drop the ball after first class,deadpool and logan.
I actually liked last stand but it was worse than the first two films but better than apocalypse and supposedly dark phoenix.The trailers made it look much worse. The last stand wasn't that terrible, everybody just hated on it because it ruined a couple beloved characters.. Understandably.
Yeah it wasn't that bad. They just trashed juggernaut and even the Phoenix herself. If you want to know how bad that can annoy people, see 'origins.'I actually liked last stand but it was worse than the first two films but better than apocalypse and supposedly dark phoenix.
That's very easy to believe. Origins just had too many character mistakes/misrepresentations.. Other than that, it was decent. Being that they have fixed deadpool, its not nearly as bad. Deadpool even paid homage to origins, and showed it could just be a slightly different timeline, when the main baddie in 1 told Wade he was going to sew his mouth shut.lol jeremy jahns said it was worse than wolverine origins lmao.
X-Men fans + People who think it’s a MCU movie (yep they’re still out there) + bored people who watch everything + people who like to shit on movies + GoT fans + Fans of redheads.No way this makes 50 million