- Joined
- Jul 7, 2011
- Messages
- 15,875
- Reaction score
- 27,016
Well its mostly the same couple of guys. And that doesnt tell anything. For the sake of argument even if the majority was against it, so what? The majority are always on falsehood.
You yourself brought up your soccer analogy!!!! Now after your socceranalogy has been refuted you wanna go run away from soccer. You truly are insincere! Now respond to your corrected socceranalogy or just beat it.
"But your analogy is not accurate you see. Now Usman and Colby are not like Real Madrid in your example. They are like a team who posses the ball the whole time and do not do offense. Just passing the ball from back to side to center and back again on 60% of the field, wasting time. And if occasionally they do try to go to the front and attack they lose the ball and get a counterattack. These kind of soccerteams exist and its no wonder the crowd is booing exactly at this type of game! Yeah the opponent cant do much but wait, but they are also not being threatend at the same time. They can have 60% of the field and pass the ball all they want and do nothing with it, the opponent is just patiently waiting for the counterattack. Now Usman and Colby are exactly this soccerteam but it gets worse because they do it on purpose because some rulemaker was of the opinion to give points for this kind of behaviour. This is a more accurate analogy."
You’re an idiot. I’m done. You actually initially brought up the soccer analogy. Everybody else can see how bad your idea is except you. You’re yet to refute a litany of examples where your system falls apart. Yet to acknowledge that more draws will hold up divisions and that more talented fighters will be prevented from climbing the rankings. Yet to acknowledge that nobody will agree to the terms of not getting paid without a finish. Yet to acknowledge that some of the best fighters in the sport have worst records than middle of the road ones. Yet to acknowledge that controlling your opponent and shutting down their game should be rewarded and is in no way an even fight. Yet to acknowledge fighters can dominate a fight without 10-8 rounds. Yet to acknowledge the heavy bias your system has against control based grapplers. Yet to acknowledge that over half of all fights would be draws and yet to acknowledge that would kill interest. Yet to acknowledge that losing fighters would game the system to get draws in fights they are losing. Yet to acknowledge that nobody would want to fight a durable fighter. Yet to acknowledge this system would make ducking far more prevalent.
Your idea is full of holes. Put it to a poll if you think anybody agrees with your idea. I’m blocking your dumb ass, tired of your awful, rambling opinions. Your idea is shit, would never work, and would kill the sport.