- Joined
- Dec 7, 2007
- Messages
- 39,086
- Reaction score
- 11,624
Where the other prosecutions under this law also political?
I could understand the "political" argument if he was the only person prosecuted under this law or if his abuse of the law was minimal. But neither are true. I'm sure his being high profile didn't help but that's not the same thing as being targeted solely because he's a political figure.
I live in a major metropolitan city. Every year, local or state politicians get arrested for some sort of financial malfeasance. Sometimes it's big, sometimes it's medium. But it's not abnormal.
The theme that I keep reading, which I think should bother people, is that people don't care if the law was broken because he's a famous politician. Any time you prosecute a politician, people are going to read it as political. That's fine but it shouldn't override their understanding of if a law was broken or the extent to which it is broken.
I agree but sometimes so are gone after and others overlooked cut some "sweetheart" deal because of their politics.
Hell some are even not held accountable because they mentally don't understand what they did.