Actually, that's not what I'm saying at all. What I am saying is look at the landscape of the music industry currently for women only and tell me the level of competition is still as competitive as it was in the other eras? Swift's competition is currently Beyonce, Ariana Grande, Miley Cyrus, Kacey Musgraves and Dua Lipa off of the top of my head. Time may change my perspective but right now compared to other eras the competition is significantly weaker.
For example, for women only I will isolate it to the 1985 to 1991 the competition was Whitney Houston, Sade, Madonna, Mariah Carey, Aretha Franklin, Stephanie Mills and Anita Baker off the top of my head. Do I have nostalgia? Sure, but I also acknowledge that Swift is talented but when we are talking about the most iconic female musicians of all time Swift is middle of the road and I stand by that statement. I am not including any males because the question is about female musicians. If we are talking about all time then even with the list of women I listed above Swift is still middle of the road.
You can list awards and Grammy's and that's part of what makes artists important but Dolly has far less awards than Swift, but Dolly is far more iconic all time than Swift.
Your argument oversimplifies the comparison between different eras. It's true that Swift's contemporaries may not be as iconic as those from previous decades, but that doesn't diminish her impact or talent.
The music industry has evolved significantly over the years, with changing trends, technologies, and audience preferences. It's unfair to directly compare Swift's competition today with that of previous eras without considering these broader contextual factors.
Furthermore, labeling Swift as "middle of the road" among female musicians overlooks her achievements and influence in contemporary music. She has broken numerous records, amassed a dedicated fan base, and continues to push boundaries with her music and activism.
You can list awards and Grammy's and that's part of what makes artists important but Dolly has far less awards than Swift, but Dolly is far more iconic all time than Swift.
Let's put things into perspective here. Dolly Parton has been a force in the music industry for over 50 years, while Taylor Swift has been on the scene since 2003. That's a significant difference in time to make an impact.
Yes, Dolly has had three decades more than Taylor to leave her mark on the industry and popular culture. But that doesn't discount Taylor's achievements or potential for future iconic status.
It's unfair to compare their legacies at this point in Taylor's career.
It's worth noting that Dolly Parton herself has praised Taylor Swift, calling her a phenomenon. That's high praise coming from a legend like Dolly. And who knows? Given Taylor's trajectory and influence, it's entirely possible that in another 30 years, she'll be regarded as an icon on par with Dolly Parton herself.
You seem determined to criticize Taylor Swift simply because it's fashionable to do so at the moment, but I'm not buying what you're trying to sell.
Once more, it's evident you're not a fan of Taylor Swift, so why not just admit it instead of trying to fabricate arguments where there are none?
Your arguments lack logical coherence and factual basis. It's evident that you're biased against Taylor Swift due to your personal dislike for her. Stop pretending to be impartial and presenting your opinions as facts.
Edit: I have nothing more to contribute to this discussion because it seems you're only interested in being argumentative without offering any substantial insights.
So, feel free to carry on the conversation, but I won't be reading or responding further.
Take care.