- Joined
- May 3, 2007
- Messages
- 10,958
- Reaction score
- 0
yeah, my beagle sleeps under the blankets every night.
Sharing your bed with an infant could kill it and you're giving the child a sense of independence when they have their own room. You're oversimplifying the bond between a man and their dog as well. Its not just an american thing either.
Sharing your bed with an infant could kill it and you're giving the child a sense of independence when they have their own room.
You're oversimplifying the bond between a man and their dog as well. Its not just an american thing either.
The American dog obsession freaks me out. People put their infant human children in a separate crib (and often a separate room), but will share a bed with an animal. It's seriously one of the strangest cultural phenomenon's I've ever heard of.
My dog sleeps outside, where dogs have been sleeping for thousands of years without complaint.
my dog is a member of our family, he sleeps in his house where he wants to. its no obsession.
please tell me you're not one of those assholes that keeps a dog on a chain.
Dogs are just animals.
I've never seen the big deal about keeping a dog on a chain as long as it has food and water. I certainly wouldn't consider someone an asshole for doing it..
The American dog obsession freaks me out. People put their infant human children in a separate crib (and often a separate room), but will share a bed with an animal. It's seriously one of the strangest cultural phenomenon's I've ever heard of.
My dog sleeps outside, where dogs have been sleeping for thousands of years without complaint.
Infants don't need independence. Teenagers, maybe, but not infants. And why would you kill it? It's pretty common practice in many countries to have a child sleep in bed with the parents until they're a bit older and I've never once heard of an infant dying because of it.
I agree that maybe its not just an American thing, but I've never lived in other western countries, so I didn't want to lump them in without firsthand evidence.
Dogs are just animals. That's not oversimplification. The only reason people get so close to them is because they're pretty much the neediest pack-oriented animals that won't kill the owner and people like the power/sense of responsibility dogs give them.
In the States it's a developmental thing, for what it's worth. We call what you're describing "attachment parenting." We aren't as wary of spoiling our pets like we might our children.Infants don't need independence. Teenagers, maybe, but not infants. And why would you kill it? It's pretty common practice in many countries to have a child sleep in bed with the parents until they're a bit older and I've never once heard of an infant dying because of it.
That doesn't mean anything at all to someone with a heart. Life is life. The intellect of that life doesn't change the fact that it's still a life.
Dogs have been scientifically proven to show empathy for their families more than any animal in the world (other than wolves which are very similar) and are even more empathetic than many humans.
They're also so incredibly loyal that they would die for their families without even thinking twice. They love with such ferocity that people who are willing to perceive it will recognize this. And those who are actually compassionate enough to feel that empathy will be compelled to return it.
Loving a dog shows a slew of good qualities about a person. Being out right dispassionate and even believing it's weird to show that type of love for an animal definitely shows things about your personality as well.
There is absolutely no point in having a pet if it's just going to be out right inconsequential and not affect your life beyond the inconvenience of you having to water it and feed it. Someone keeping an animal on a chain but otherwise ignoring its existence is a blatant show of stupidity.
It's also fucked up because that dog has wants and desires (also a scientific fact) and none of them revolve around sitting in the same fuckign spot for the entirety of its physical existence.
Dogs experience happiness, sadness, fun, etc. and keeping one on a chain is very comparable to doing the same to a human as far as what it does psychologically.
You are human, so you think it's different, but that's the only reason you think it's different as it has the same effect on a dog that it would have on a human.
People accidentally roll on the baby in their sleep and smother it to death.
In the States it's a developmental thing, for what it's worth. We call what you're describing "attachment parenting." We aren't as wary of spoiling our pets like we might our children.
I don't hold American parenting in particular high esteem. I think anyone who has seen how children in developing countries behave can tell that Americans have some pretty strange and ineffective child-rearing philosophies.
Most social animals sleep with their young. It's pretty normal. Sleeping next to an infant isn't "spoiling" a child.
Interestingly, modern American parenting philosophy also encourages responding immediately to your child's crying to avoid feelings of abandonment, among other things. In many countries where its common knowledge to keep your infant close at night, it's also common knowledge that babies sometimes cry for no reason and that responding to a baby everytime it cries will make it a whiny brat.
^Those countries have less whiny brats.
You're dealing with strange fucking people. These are the same folks who carry on long conversations with their pets, in English, as they walk down the street, tell them not to do something, or compliment them as if one day the dog will respond back in English.
Eddie Griffin kinda summed my feelings on dogs. He really hits the nail on the head about affection. Don't watch if you are offended by Eddie's dirty mouth, lol.