- Joined
- Nov 24, 2010
- Messages
- 25,744
- Reaction score
- 9,986
How the fuck are people on forums/websites comparing Miz's battle royal antics to Flair's RR win in 1992?
I've been reading several sites today, and people are like: "Yeah, Miz doing the same shit as Flair in 92". Seriously, have these people even seen this match? Flair went after EVERYBODY in that RR, he even jumped Taker, when UT was still the demon that everyone cowered in front of. He was put over as a legitimate, super in shape champion. Heenan and Monsoon continually referred to that fact that the WWE guys were very worried about Ric, and what a threat he was.
Miz on the other hand is gone for 95% of the match, jumps in and wins. It makes him look weak, and makes the rest of the guys in the match look like idiots for not having thought of and used the same tactics.
Flair was #3 in that one, right? So he pretty much lasted the whole time, and once again (even near the end of his prime) proved why he was the iron man in the 80s.