This is what happens when you take part of an information from a link and think you can pull up the subset of information to prop up your own out of context arugment...
"Davis estimates that 1 million to 1.25 million Europeans were enslaved in North Africa, from the beginning of the 16th century to the middle of the 18th, by
slave tradersfrom Tunis, Algiers, and Tripoli alone
(these numbers do not include the European people who were enslaved by Morocco and by other raiders and traders of the Mediterranean Sea coast),"
You miss the fact its still going to contain some of what was already brought up that dismantles your claim.
You should actually stick to never providing links...when you actually try to defend your argument, you fail even harder since this now increases the number of slaves taken by Africa even MORE than my original link did which only included the extra slaves that were being KEPT and left the amount sold in question...how you have to factor in Every north African nation into the mix.
Correction, someone that isnt retarded has to do that. You will just deny it because you are dumb as a rock and new information cant get passed all the air in your head to any grey matter...