- Status
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2004
- Messages
- 43,058
- Reaction score
- 13,054
Interestingly, if you followed the Wikileaks email revelations about Chelsea and Doug Band, Chelsea actually comes off pretty well.
It looks like she was trying to get rid of the sleazy influence peddlers making bank off her old man.
Although Band's criticisms of her are probably also on the money.
Pretty sure the Clinton brand is dead though.
It looks like she was trying to get rid of the sleazy influence peddlers making bank off her old man.
Although Band's criticisms of her are probably also on the money.
Pretty sure the Clinton brand is dead though.
I would agree if she didn't know her $3,000,000 wedding was being paid for out of the coffer of the foundation.
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2016
- Messages
- 5,735
- Reaction score
- 7,195
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2016
- Messages
- 5,735
- Reaction score
- 7,195
New York Times: We blew it on Trump
To our readers,
When the biggest political story of the year reached a dramatic and unexpected climax late Tuesday night, our newsroom turned on a dime and did what it has done for nearly two years — cover the 2016 election with agility and creativity.
After such an erratic and unpredictable election there are inevitable questions: Did Donald Trump’s sheer unconventionality lead us and other news outlets to underestimate his support among American voters? What forces and strains in America drove this divisive election and outcome? Most important, how will a president who remains a largely enigmatic figure actually govern when he takes office?
As we reflect on this week’s momentous result, and the months of reporting and polling that preceded it, we aim to rededicate ourselves to the fundamental mission of Times journalism. That is to report America and the world honestly, without fear or favor, striving always to understand and reflect all political perspectives and life experiences in the stories that we bring to you. It is also to hold power to account, impartially and unflinchingly. We believe we reported on both candidates fairly during the presidential campaign. You can rely on The New York Times to bring the same fairness, the same level of scrutiny, the same independence to our coverage of the new president and his team.
We cannot deliver the independent, original journalism for which we are known without the loyalty of our subscribers. We want to take this opportunity, on behalf of all Times journalists, to thank you for that loyalty.
Sincerely,
Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr.
Publisher
Dean Baquet
Executive Editor
To our readers,
When the biggest political story of the year reached a dramatic and unexpected climax late Tuesday night, our newsroom turned on a dime and did what it has done for nearly two years — cover the 2016 election with agility and creativity.
After such an erratic and unpredictable election there are inevitable questions: Did Donald Trump’s sheer unconventionality lead us and other news outlets to underestimate his support among American voters? What forces and strains in America drove this divisive election and outcome? Most important, how will a president who remains a largely enigmatic figure actually govern when he takes office?
As we reflect on this week’s momentous result, and the months of reporting and polling that preceded it, we aim to rededicate ourselves to the fundamental mission of Times journalism. That is to report America and the world honestly, without fear or favor, striving always to understand and reflect all political perspectives and life experiences in the stories that we bring to you. It is also to hold power to account, impartially and unflinchingly. We believe we reported on both candidates fairly during the presidential campaign. You can rely on The New York Times to bring the same fairness, the same level of scrutiny, the same independence to our coverage of the new president and his team.
We cannot deliver the independent, original journalism for which we are known without the loyalty of our subscribers. We want to take this opportunity, on behalf of all Times journalists, to thank you for that loyalty.
Sincerely,
Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr.
Publisher
Dean Baquet
Executive Editor
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2016
- Messages
- 2,968
- Reaction score
- 0
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2014
- Messages
- 10,520
- Reaction score
- 0
I know. Its sad but its a fact if life that people are dumb enough to follow their celebs into the vote.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2009
- Messages
- 15,112
- Reaction score
- 0
Trump did 60 Minutes. Will come out soon.
Apparently he wants to keep pre-existing conditions part of ACA. How is he going to do that without a) keeping the individual mandate or b) creating a new spending program that the Republicans will oppose?
I think he will most likely get into a big fight with the GOP very quickly.
I also predict Trump will be re-elected in a landslide.
Apparently he wants to keep pre-existing conditions part of ACA. How is he going to do that without a) keeping the individual mandate or b) creating a new spending program that the Republicans will oppose?
I think he will most likely get into a big fight with the GOP very quickly.
I also predict Trump will be re-elected in a landslide.
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2014
- Messages
- 10,520
- Reaction score
- 0
Hes gonna get into a fight with the gop trying to pass those anti lobbying bills
- Status
Latest posts
-
PBP UFC 301 - Pantoja vs. Erceg Preliminary Card PBP Discussion: Sat. 5 / 4 at 6pm ET- Latest: HI SCOTT NEWMAN
-
-
-
