- Joined
- Jul 6, 2003
- Messages
- 4,184
- Reaction score
- 199
All of them are mentally ill we must to pity themHate to rain on the parade in here, but the guy is just mentally ill. No terrorism link.
All of them are mentally ill we must to pity themHate to rain on the parade in here, but the guy is just mentally ill. No terrorism link.
And you’re still not sure?
Hate to rain on the parade in here, but the guy is just mentally ill. No terrorism link.
Yeah....I hear that there is a sizeable Catholic population in Afghanistan along with some significant enclaves of Buddhists.Yes. Afghan "descent" doesn't mean he's a muslim or an immigrant.
Yeah....I hear that there is a sizeable Catholic population in Afghanistan along with some significant enclaves of Buddhists.
*insert sarcasm emoji*
Not me.
Never heard of a non-Muslim Afghan. I’m guessing the statistics on such a likelihood are negligible.It's not as true in Melbourne, but we've had Australians of Afghan descent where I live for nearly 2 centuries now.
You also might not be aware, but the majority of Afghan refugees we've taken in recently (post 9/11) have been religious minorities.
Mostly Hazara, but yes, also Christians.
Never heard of a non-Muslim Afghan. I’m guessing the statistics on such a likelihood are negligible.
You forgot the Scientologists.Overall they are a very small percentage, numbering in the thousands, but because religious minorities facing persecution are a priority for the refugee program we are more likely to see them.
Most of our Afghan refugees are Hazara, but there's Christians, Sikhs, Hindus, Zoroastrians and Bahai as well.
You forgot the Scientologists.
You disgust me.
You help your own people first. Then you help others, in their own country. You don't bring them all here.
That's weird, because I think you're cute.
Good idea, cutie. Maybe you should sell it to your federal government. I mean, I would be willing to bet all those millions of displaced persons would have much preferred their countries to have remained inhabitable and became prosperous instead of being plagued by regime change and war.
My government isn't forcing people to pick up an AK and start committing atrocities.
The world should come together and help these people where they are, not pick and choose which countries should bare the burden.
Hmmm, not sure if serious.
I agree. The countries/economies responsible for the humanitarian disasters should unilaterally choose to "bare the burden." And, yes, that includes Saudi Arabia (just to a much smaller extent than the US).
Minority or ethnic person commits an attack? All immigrants, all refugees, all Muslims etc are bad and it can't possibly be mental illness (even if the background of the person is unknown).
Conservative white guy does an attack? Lone wolf, mentally ill, no true Scotsman, can't prevent this they'd find a way etc.
Again and again. Stay classy war room.