Bellator 202 (Friday) does 405k Viewers

[mime]

Source: http://www.showbuzzdaily.com/articl...cable-originals-network-finals-7-13-2018.html

Bad but expected bad, maybe within range of what was expected? I have no idea anymore. Sat being a tape delay and against the UFC will do much worse I think

 

[svmVR2097]

Source: http://www.showbuzzdaily.com/articl...cable-originals-network-finals-7-13-2018.html

Bad but expected bad, maybe within range of what was expected? I have no idea anymore. Sat being a tape delay and against the UFC will do much worse I think

Did women's mma ever do well on the old "network for men"?

 

[kingcillo24]

Did women's mma ever do well on the old "network for men"?

The UFC didn't WMMA at that point.

 

[svmVR2097]

The UFC didn't WMMA at that point.

I just somewhat remember Macfarlane on some earlier Bellator cards that did better than this, didn't know if she became popular for the network or so and didn't hear any news on how Bellator 201 did.

 

[skylolow]

Safe to say 400K to 475K is the new norm for Bellator.

Who would of thought a name change of channel and reprogramming design to bring in more viewers is working overall and Bellator ratings take an immediate 200K dip. Hard to believe a good 200K just abandon the product because of this. Not too mention, Bellator's roster is easily the best its ever been. On some level this has to be just shocking to Viacom/Paramount people.

 

[EndlessCritic]

You mean to tell me julia budd doesn't attract viewers?