- Joined
- Oct 29, 2006
- Messages
- 27,507
- Reaction score
- 30,121
Money talks. Brock got his time off though, didn't he? He also was claiming it was due to the tainted supplements. But the needle that broke the back of the camel is the JJ situation. That USADA is a shell for UFC, they are fking complicit - is there not a conflict of interest of what that Novitzky guy did with JJ thingy? They and UFC have no credibility when it comes to drug testing.
Some get a pass and others get ignored and shutdown, like Hunt for instance.
If the anti-doping agency is paid by UFC and UFC is organizing the even which it is interested in being commercially successful, do you not see how UFC controlling sufficiently the anti-doping agency might be considered as a potential conflict of interest. Do you see how some party can decide to influence the other so that they get to defraud general public?
1. Novitzky works for the UFC. He's never been affiliated with USADA. What he was doing last week was his job not a conflict of interest.
2. If you think that it's a conflict of interest for a sports league to pay a drug testing agency for their services, then you're opposing the entire concept of third-party testing because that's how it works.