- Joined
- Dec 31, 2013
- Messages
- 26,890
- Reaction score
- 1
I agree in principal that police should not shoot kids in the back, bu tin this specific case, the details seem to justify the shooting. I think the wrong shooting is being protested here. It's the other kid who needs his poems read and candlelight vigils and all that.
Agreed. Though I think there is still a conversation to be had about how sure you have to be before you shoot. As I stated above, I'm not sure the cop knew that the runner was a murderer.
Edit: The police stated that Rose was unarmed when he was shot, but that two firearms were found in the car from which he had fled. Police stated that the driver of the car was not responsible for the earlier drive-by shooting and was released from custody later that evening.
What if the driver had fled?