- Joined
- Nov 20, 2015
- Messages
- 1,085
- Reaction score
- 0
Also I have no issue considering him a top 20, but it really confuses me when I see people saying he is top 5 no doubt. We have very good reasons to doubt it.
This is a joke thread. What a bullshit post. Chandler is a monster. Smh can’t believe what I’m reading.
Chandler is top 10 IMO which makes him an elite fighter.
“Nowhere near the top 25 LWs”??He's good but hes nowhere near the top 25 LWs. He'd get absolutely smoked in the UFC just like Brooks has been.
“Nowhere near the top 25 LWs”??
Are you blind??
Chandler would be a top 10/5 fighter in the ufc, easy.
Prime Bendo was a beast. He honestly never looked the same after RDA did him in.Chandler would expose UFC LWs just like he EXPOSED Benson Henderson
Nope he wouldn't. He just lost his last fight to a guy who was ranked #74.
http://www.fightmatrix.com/fighter-profile/Brent+Primus/58782/
Yes I know it's Fight Matrix but it gives some context as to how low Primus was ranked.
And previously Chandler got beat twice by Will Brooks, who has been nothing short of an abject failure in the UFC.
This guy is a moron don’t even bother. Must have some personal vendetta against Chandler or something. Whole thread doesn’t even make sense.Since when does mma math work?
Like volkan oezdamir went 1-1 in bellator looked mediocre at best....now UFC title contender.
Or Derrick lewis went 0-1 in bellator now #6 in the UFC.
Only fucking idiots use mma math as a basis for ANY argument lmfao.
Reminds me of all the brainless ZUFFA zombies who claimed Strikeforce guys were B leagues and weren't UFC caliber ......Bwahahahs
Champion after champion later you don't hear that false narrative anymore.