- Joined
- Nov 9, 2007
- Messages
- 3,199
- Reaction score
- 0
Long story short, hype kills.
It's not uniquely effective as shown by a lot of wrestlers in vale tudo. It's Judo applied to a certain rule set (which had been done before). We just called it BJJ because those types of matches continued in popularity in Brazil whenthey had lost steam in the US and Europe.
The UFC was set up for Royce to win. There were plenty of guys from Brazil and other places who would have been recruited if it were really about finding the best fighters.
and UFC 2 and UFC 3 and UFC 4? right?
go cry a river, judokas were part of the early UFC, so was ken fucking shamrcok who at the time, in all mighty japan was the n
Yeah, it's different in that they had to adapt to the rules (which Judo players did before they even went to Brazil). But even with no striking training a pure grappler will beat a pure striker.
what you guys failed to understand is that GJJ is not judo, its however a SET OF TECHNIQUES derivated from judo, and primary GJJ was in fact Judo with another strategy, trained for Vale Tudo.
what sets apart and has been setting apart GJJ/BJJ is its focus on fighting, not just grappling. early 70s 80s 90s GJJ practitioners were vale tudo fighters, most of them, at least trained for Vale Tudo, not for the olympics, the assumption that because there were better grapplers in Judo (or better athletes doing pure judo) could just walk in a cage and judo win is ridiculous, fighting is not pure grappling, specially when a both guys have some type of grappling skills.
Barnett offers an interesting counter narrative but I believe he is just as biased as the Gracies. Like them, he is marketing himself and his style.
I'm sure the truth is somewhere in the middle.
They were in Brazil and Russia and a lot of places. If you don't think there were people who could fight in 1993, you are clueless.
The point is that BJJ is nothing new under the sun. It's grappling well-marketed. And the problem with the hype is that we get this idiotic TMA attitude of "Grandmaster Helio invented leverage for you plebes".
LOL at BJJ guys getting mad at someone giving a more realistic history of jiu-jistu in Brazil than the Gracie propaganda and getting mad because Josh Barnett got some attention for CACC.
Deal With It
The point is that BJJ is nothing new under the sun. It's grappling well-marketed. And the problem with the hype is that we get this idiotic TMA attitude of "Grandmaster Helio invented leverage for you plebes".
after a while, you really got to be an oxymoron to believe the official gracie story of helio being extremely weak and developing ninja moves to overcome the stronger guy. You just have to look at pictures of helio back in those days if you didnt go..hmmm wait a minute, theres something wrong with you.
True, but I think it's funny how he did that at a Gracie event.
Gracie Judo, IMO.
History started way before 1970 as did Judo and jiu-jistu before it.
BJJ is Judo applied to fights with open rules compared with judo, including striking and that application hardly started in Brazil.
I just started reading it yesterday and can't put it down. It's fascinating how this version of history differs from what we hear at BJJ schools today.
...
I hope he actually does volume two of the book talking about 1950-1999.
who cares where it started? Judo is pre old Jiu jitsu applicated to sports, who the fuck cares? what made the difference between GJJ and Judo it was the training you got, if you wouldve walked in the 60's into a Judo academy you would be drilling tds and some ground work, if you wouldve walkled into a GJJ academy you would be drilling ground work with strikes involved. Its the training what makes the difference.
I'm still confused. mixmartialartshistory website says the Catch guys in England didn't use submissions until the Japanese judoka taught them submissions. yet Barnett says everyone was learning subs from the catch guys.
this book is interesting but wow is it boring. pretty much a translation of newspaper articles.
the other thing I'm weary about is how many of these fights where real vs staged.
People have been combining Judo with LARPing (aka "Japanese jiu-jistu) for a long time. GJJ from the likes of Ralph Gracie or Mario Sperry is not what most BJJ people are doing or have ever done. That's especially true today. Most people will either grapple or LARP, but they won't fight vale tudo.
The history of BJJ is tainted by self-promotion.
who cares where it started? Judo is pre old Jiu jitsu applicated to sports, who the fuck cares? what made the difference between GJJ and Judo it was the training you got, if you wouldve walked in the 60's into a Judo academy you would be drilling tds and some ground work, if you wouldve walkled into a GJJ academy you would be drilling ground work with strikes involved. Its the training what makes the difference.
Gjj/bjj was never about larping, and you saying htat only shows how ignorant you are on the history of bjj/gjj.