- Joined
- Oct 7, 2007
- Messages
- 81,773
- Reaction score
- 133,907
Don't make me destroy youNot only did he read it, he's going to re-read it and then re-read it again. Then he's going to blow his rape whistle at you again.
Don't make me destroy youNot only did he read it, he's going to re-read it and then re-read it again. Then he's going to blow his rape whistle at you again.
Based on the immediate shift to insults when I posted something he didn't like it sure does seem like I hurt his precious little feelings, doesn't it?Not only did he read it, he's going to re-read it and then re-read it again. Then he's going to blow his rape whistle at you again.
"Like" or "fine with"?Because most people like WMMA. It's only insecure dorks that cry about it.
NopeReally? So the overwhelming "popularity" of Invicta isn't evidence?
The talent pool is much larger.The fact that the UFC has done plenty of male only cards since the introduction of WMMA, yet not a single female only card isn't evidence?
Nope, not of whether something is entertaining or popular, noThe comparison between male and physical capabilities and the history of professional female athletes being embarrassed competing against young teenage boys isn't evidence?
Nothing I have said has been remotely ideological.Just because evidence hurts your feelings and offends you on an ideological level, doesn't mean it's not evidence,
You lack self-awareness.Based on the immediate shift to insults when I posted something he didn't like it sure does seem like I hurt his precious little feelings, doesn't it?
I'm sure he'll feel better after a good cry and venting to is therapist about it.
Valid question."Like" or "fine with"?
Same
Based on the immediate shift to insults when I posted something he didn't like it sure does seem like I hurt his precious little feelings, doesn't it?
I'm sure he'll feel better after a good cry and venting to is therapist about it.
I thought it was too long and you didn't read it princess? Proving yourself a liar... I am sure we're all shocked by this unforeseen revelation.On some level you know you are wrong.
No it isn't, because merit is subjective. Are women physically weaker than men? On average, yes, definitely. Are female fights less entertaining than men's fights? Well now that's matter of opinion
I have already tried debating you in good faith. Multiple times. I have learned from that mistake. You are a fundamentally dishonest person.
Cope
Wrong
True
Not by you, and not in a context that proves anything
I'm fine, thanks
You are literally trying to convince people to not enjoy something. You are the one arguing from ideology.
The only question that really matters about MMA is whether the fight is entertaining.
You refuse to watch WMMA fights with an open mind, and as a result have robbed yourself of many great fights. If you want to do that, go right ahead.
Meanwhile I'll be here watching MMA.
The UFC could easily fill a card with women fighters and top it with championship fights in three, technically four divisions (does women's 145 even exist anymore?)Nope
The talent pool is much larger.
Nope, not of whether something is entertaining or popular, no
Nothing I have said has been remotely ideological.
Nah, that's not him. I'm sure he's much fatter in real life... and I doubt anyone would recognise the good sir, white knight in the real world without his ceremonial fedora.I don't think you realize you were talking to.
View attachment 1036793
He's kind of a big deal around here.
They could, and it would be a decent card. But why would they?The UFC could easily fill a card with women fighters and top it with championship fights in three, technically four divisions (does women's 145 even exist anymore?)
Because that's dumb?We ALL, including you know exactly why they won't though.
Show me literally one statement I have made that is ideological in nature.Your uncanny ability to try and justify ignoring all evidence that contradicts your views isn't at all ideologically based... nope, not a single person believes that it is... sure
I was joking, silly goose.I thought it was too long and you didn't read it princess? Proving yourself a liar... I am sure we're all shocked by this unforeseen revelation.
Disagree. Just efficient!One word answers make you look like an idiot.
Yeah you are.I am trying to convince people of no such thing.
Nah, we come back to your fundamentally dishonest nature. I don't think you are even honest with yourself.Again, we come back to basic reading comprehension or the lack thereof on your part.
An assumption based on a mountain of anecdotal evidence, which is your favourite!You assume that others didn't watch WMMA with an open mind come to their own conclusions but that's all it is, an assumption on your part.
Because the UFC has a monopoly. The Invicta comparison is only valid if every female fighter was in Invicta. As it is, the vast majority of elite female fighters are signed to the UFC. Like every other promotion they have to make do with prospects and UFC rejects.If as you stated previously that "most" people liked MMA then why isn't Invicta a success?
The talent pool, dummy.Why are the number of cards they run every year dropping instead of increasing? Why are they doing male only but no female only UFC cards?
Are they? Prove itWhy are nearly all female sports LOSING money?
You have yet to introduce any observable evidence.The observable evidence is not on your side on this one good sir white knight.
When the viewership would be in the toilet? I agree, will never happen.They could, and it would be a decent card. But why would they?
Because that's dumb?
I like variety in my MMA. They shouldn't do an all HW card either.
Show me literally one statement I have made that is ideological in nature.
OpinionWhen the viewership would be in the toilet? I agree, will never happen.
Because most people who like WMMA also like MMMA. Almost all of us actually, since we are actual MMA fans and not just exclusively fans of fighters with male genitalia.Why is it dumb if you're so convinced of the popularity of WMMA, it should be a ratings smash right? Do you think the UFC is just afraid their ratings would be too high?
I'm not a nice guy, sorry if I hurt your feelings.How about you go back and start by looking at all the insults you made because someone disagrees with you about WMMA?
No, they did not.I'll save you the time. They all looked like: You disagree with me so you're a <insert insults and shaming language here>
"Yeah you are."I was joking, silly goose.
Disagree. Just efficient!
Yeah you are.
Nah, we come back to your fundamentally dishonest nature. I don't think you are even honest with yourself.
An assumption based on a mountain of anecdotal evidence, which is your favourite!
Because the UFC has a monopoly. The Invicta comparison is only valid if every female fighter was in Invicta. As it is, the vast majority of elite female fighters are signed to the UFC. Like every other promotion they have to make do with prospects and UFC rejects.
The talent pool, dummy.
Are they? Prove it
You have yet to introduce any observable evidence.
That article does not support your claim. I am curious how you got there.
TLDR"Yeah you are."
OK, show me one single quote where I have ever attempted to talk people out of watching WMMA, I'll wait.
"Nah, we come back to your fundamentally dishonest nature. I don't think you are even honest with yourself"
Really? So, what exactly have I been dishonest about? Again, I am happily waiting on ANY evidence to back up such an assertion.
"An assumption based on a mountain of anecdotal evidence, which is your favourite!"
Read back through the conversation slowly... use a dictionary if required. You were the one making assumptions based on no evidence, not me.
"The talent pool, dummy."
Exactly. 3-4 divisions and even you admit that there isn't the talent pool to put together one decent card. At least you admit that.
"Are they? Prove it"
Google is your friend. I'd start with WNBA and Invicta and ten start moving down the list to the even less popular competitions. The more pertinent question is despite the massive push in the mainstream media, are ANY of them actually making money?
"You have yet to introduce any observable evidence."
Just because you ignore it and refuse to respond to it when it's written, doesn't mean it isn't evidence.