While on excess deaths and travesties done. My favourite investigational journalist Sonia Elijah does another great piece of reporting.
On April 18th, in the UK House of Commons, Andrew Bridgen, MP (Independent) for North West Leicestershire gave an uncompromising and hard-hitting speech on the debate that he brought forward: “Covid-19 pandemic response and trends in excess deaths.”
soniaelijah.substack.com
Bridgen, who led the debate, opened with a powerful statement:
"We are witnesses to the greatest medical scandal in this country, in living memory and possibly ever! The excess deaths in 2022 and 2023- is that scandal. Its causes are complex but the novel and untested medical treatment described as a COVID vaccine is a large part of the problem. I've been called an anti-vaxxer as if I rejected these vaccines based on some ideology. I want to say clearly and unequivocally that I am not. I am in fact double vaccinated and vaccine harmed."
As the power labels wears off by the day as people are glimpsing and insights into the characters of the labellers. (Ironically well timed in life and thread)
"Antivaxxer" becomes a symbol of wisdom and "conspiracy theorist" is now being looked at as a critical questioner.
People that probably consider themselves as "logical" have been herded by emotional triggers implanted over generations.
These same people are blinded by their internal hubris and egos into being blind to the glaring red flags, the largest being the censorship in all aspects of this plandemic.
From the release of data being one of the key censorship problems (when you need to incorporate statistical fraud and hide the actual data you have a fake pandemic).
"Hiding the data
The MP for North West Leicestershire since 2010, went on to state:
You don't need any science training at all to be horrified by officials deliberately hiding key data in this scandal and that's exactly what's going on Madam deputy speaker. The office of National Statistics used to release weekly data on deaths per 100,000 in vaccinated and unvaccinated populations, it no longer does that and no one will explain- why the public has a right to that data!
There have been calls from serious experts whose requests I have amplified repeatedly in this house for what's called- record level data to be anonymized and disclosed for analysis. This would allow meaningful analysis of the deaths after vaccination and settle the issue of whether these experimental treatments are responsible for the increase in excess deaths once and for all.
More extensive and detailed data has already been released to the pharma companies from publicly funded bodies. Jenny Harries, head of the UK Health Security Agency said “this anonymised aggregate death by vaccination status is commercially sensitive and shouldn't be published”- the public is being denied this data- this is unacceptable, Madam deputy speaker. Yet again data is hidden with impunity- just like the post office scandal."
Through to
"Manipulating the data
Bridgen went on to explain how the Office of National Statistics (ONS) had recently changed the way they were calculating excess deaths.
He stated:
Professor Harries has also endorsed a recent massive change in the calculation of the baseline population level used by the ONS to calculate excess deaths. It's incredibly complex and opaque and by sheer coincidence it now appears to show that there's a massive excess of deaths in 2020 and 2021 and now a minimal excess deaths in 2023 under the old calculation method.
Under the old calculation method, tried and tested for decades, the excess death rate in 2023 was an astonishing 5%, long after the pandemic was over and when you would expect a deficit in deaths because so many people had sadly died in previous years.
20,000 premature deaths are now being airbrushed away in 2023 with a new normal baseline.
The controversial ONS calculation change is explained in great detail in a video by Dr John Campbell."
Then we have the murders, not mistakes, not manslaughter but murders of our most vulnerable. Those that did their time and protected us as best they could, too old to defend themselves and they trusted us and the systems in place to defend them.
The nazi label is also apt because they started in a similar place, "the useless eaters", the disabled and infirm. For the greater good of course.
"The DNRs
One of the great scandals in the early Covid response saga was the fact that countless DNRs targeting the elderly and those with certain disabilities were enacted by GPs and hospital doctors across the UK.
Bridgen explained:
In March 2020, the government conducted a consultation exercise on whether people over a certain age or with certain disabilities should have a Do Not Resuscitate orders imposed upon them, known as DNRs
A document summarising the proposals were circulated to doctors and hospitals and this was mistakenly treated as formal policy by a number of care homes and GPs up and down the country who enacted it at the same time multiple hospitals introduced a policy that they would not admit patients with DNRs because they thought that they'd be overwhelmed. The result is that people died who didn't need to die- while nurses performed Tick Tock dances."
It's an odd thing isn't yot, I haven't seen one person collapsing in the street and dying from this pandemic. Not one person I know had any problems with covid including up to one in their late 90s, not fucking one person.
YET I know around a dozen adverse and one fatal.....
All these antivaxxers I know and not one death, not one serious issue beyond what some people get on a flu.
While we're on covid, where is it? Where is this pandemic that disappears when a country is invaded.
This virus that selects the mandated working class over the unmanadated unemployed, pretty clever.
Shit the virus respects country and state lines so it cannot cross, perhaps no passport ......
behindthefdacurtain.substack.com
