- Joined
- Feb 15, 2010
- Messages
- 6,370
- Reaction score
- 4,446
Dude, what are you even talking about half the time?
Why would I choose to fully identify myself on an online forum? I don’t owe anyone anything.
I mentioned the Military only because you used a comparison between the loss of life during a world war to a vaccine. Nobody has the right to compare the loss of life in a worldwide war to any non war related issue, especially someone unwilling to do the same. Pick a pandemic or plague instead, it's more appropriate for starters.
Cash incentives to deploy? Of course an overseas deployment should pay you more. Who didn't know that Australian soldiers were paid to go overseas? Why wouldn't you pay someone for a job? What does this have to do with WW2...
You aren’t defending anything. You can’t. You just post more and more random articles anytime people put out the issues with your sources. You personally attack anyone that challenges you, you never actually acknowledge the issues with the sources.
You can make up whatever narrative about posters or vaccines that you want, but you can never actually prove your point with a single post or reference. The only person who is overly emotional is you. I told you not to trivialise the death of serving military members deployed and you told me to "Fuck up" and went completely off topic. I make fun of your articles and inability to actually read your own articles that you post. My posts are pretty tame for the war room.
I am not attempting to change your mind, just pointing out the issues in your sources. Everyone else can see that your articles are using the same strategies as the same ones you criticise except you.
Thanks for the clarification and exactly what I thought, less then fuck all. You're the one that introduced the topic like you were an expert and I asked a couple of questions that would tell me exactly how much you know and you alter course again. This is why I told you to fuck up, because you're full of shit, look at the tobe and compare it to the self righteous tone of your "I'm an expert"
The only thing you are is a liar and a person with some skill in gaslighting.
If by everyone else you mean Andy, who is too scared to debate since is intellectual tumble over a cliff. Lol same bloke thats too scared to answer how many and when. The same questions that made him up blouse and flee the first time. With the potential for drug induced brain damage I don't think I'd be bragging about his support for your reasoning.
Some details for the less feathered.
Report 98: FDA Selected Its 'Vaccines Advisory Committee' - Not Its Gene Therapy Advisory Committee - to Recommend the COVID Injections for Emergency Use, Hid Nature of Products
By Lora Hammill, BSMT, ASCP; Loree Britt; Michelle Cibelli, RN, BSN; Erika Delph, RPh; Chris Flowers, MD; Barbara Gehrett, MD; Joseph Gehrett, MD; Cassie Papillion; David Shaw; and Tony Damian
behindthefdacurtain.substack.com
"FDA Selected Its 'Vaccines Advisory Committee' - Not Its Gene Therapy Advisory Committee - to Recommend the COVID Injections for Emergency Use, Hid Nature of Products
By Lora Hammill, BSMT, ASCP; Loree Britt; Michelle Cibelli, RN, BSN; Erika Delph, RPh; Chris Flowers, MD; Barbara Gehrett, MD; Joseph Gehrett, MD; Cassie Papillion; David Shaw; and Tony Damian"
COVID-19 'vaccine' drugs are modified mRNA gene therapy products. So, why did the FDA assign the review and recommendation responsibilities to the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Committee (VRBPAC) instead of the Cellular Tissue and Gene Therapy Advisory Committee (CTGTAC)? CTGTAC was the logical FDA advisory committee for such a product. Yet the FDA insisted on calling the COVID-19 gene therapy injections 'vaccines' and assigned them to VRBPAC."
.
.
.
.
"There is a greater potential risk of delayed adverse events following exposure to human Gene Therapy (GT) products. Per the FDA website:
“The possibility of site-specific changes in the human genome raises the potential for
******malignancies (cancer),******
impairment of gene function
******prolonged exposure to the protein produced and the potential for autoimmune-like reactions.******"
Mmmm two out of theee and we'll see about the reproductive effects going forward.
"Why Did the CDC Change the Definition of ‘Vaccine’ and ‘Vaccination’ in September 2021, 10 Months After EUA Was Granted to Pfizer and Moderna for Their COVID-19 Drugs?"
For me it was covering a potential oversight and forward planning.