International Hamas launches surprise attack on Israel; Israel has declared a state of war. Vol. III

[BIKES!]

I'm sorry, but I can't take these numbers seriously.

Source: Aj Jazeera and the Palestinian Ministry of Health.

Propaganda at its finest. The lack of an acknowledgment and sweeping under the rug of the worst terrorist attack in modern history says it all. The cult of terrorist sympathizers across the globe causing havoc with hate crimes won’t stop at the Jews. Giddy up sheep

 

[DiddlyDoodly]

90% of the media I'm seeing would seem to be pro-Israeli to me.

All of the videos of the protests that I am seeing from all over the world would suggest otherwise.

 

[DiddlyDoodly]

I remember when Trump had Soleimani killed, the Left claimed that Trump had started WW3.

 

[SammyPops]

Western coverage of Israel’s war on Gaza – bias or unprofessionalism?
Media experts say some agencies are ‘legitimising Israeli war crimes’ in Gaza.

By Mat Nashed
Published On 29 Oct 202329 Oct 2023
Publishing unsubstantiated claims, telling only one side of the story, and painting Palestinians as nothing more than objects in Hamas’s hands are all unprofessional mistakes Western media makes while covering the conflict between Israel and Hamas, media experts and Arab journalists say.

Experts and journalists who spoke to Al Jazeera said the systemic “bias in favour of Israel” is “irreparably damaging” the credibility of news agencies considered “mainstream” in the eyes of Arabs and others.

As Western media organisations “dehumanise Palestinians” and “legitimise Israeli violations of international law” as Israel bombs Gaza, it is glaringly obvious that the vital historical context of the trauma Palestinians have been through for the past 75 years is being left out, experts say.

One-sided

On October 7, Hamas launched an unprecedented attack on military outposts and communities in southern Israel, killing more than 1,400 Israelis and taking more than 200 hostages back to Gaza, according to Israeli officials.

The same day, Israel launched a relentless bombardment of Gaza that has killed more than 8,000 people, about 40 percent of whom are children.

It also devastated Gaza’s health sector and flattened much of its infrastructure while strengthening its choke-hold siege by cutting off fuel, water and food – acts that may amount to war crimes under international humanitarian law.

United Nations experts say Palestinians in Gaza are facing the risk of genocide.

Western correspondents have gone to Israel where they reported extensively on the grief of Israeli families, but Israel has not allowed foreign journalists to enter Gaza, which means they’re missing a vital aspect of the story.

“If you don’t live in Gaza, if you don’t listen to the prayers Palestinians make when they lose loved ones, if you don’t learn about the life story of loved ones [who have been killed] …then the coverage [of Gaza] won’t be the same [as the coverage of Israel],” Taghreed El-Khodary, an analyst from Gaza, told Al Jazeera from her home in the Netherlands.

This means, she continued, that they “are not just covering the Israeli narrative, but they are living the Israeli narrative”.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023...israels-war-on-gaza-bias-or-unprofessionalism

-Genocide sponsored by the west!

No shit. Anyone who watches msm for more than 20 minutes can see this.
western propaganda is in full effect.

 

[kflo]

Here it is. You can stop pretending it says something different now.



On 1 April 2011, Goldstone retracted his claim that it was Israeli government policy to deliberately target citizens, saying "While the investigations published by the Israeli military and recognized in the U.N. committee's report have established the validity of some incidents that we investigated in cases involving individual soldiers, they also indicate that civilians were not intentionally targeted as a matter of policy."[17] On 14 April 2011 the three other co-authors of the Report, Hina Jilani, Christine in and Desmond Travers, released a joint statement criticizing Goldstone's recantation of this aspect of the report. They all agreed that the report was valid and that Israel and Hamas had failed to investigate alleged war crimes satisfactorily.

Goldstone wrote that the mission lacked evidence about why civilians were targeted in Gaza and so based its conclusion that Israel intentionally targeting civilians because it had no evidence to base any other conclusion on, but that subsequent investigations "indicate that civilians were not intentionally targeted as a matter of policy". In contrast, he wrote that "it goes without saying" that Hamas intentionally targeted Israeli civilians. Goldstone praised Israel for investigating claims of war crimes while faulting Hamas for its failure to launch any investigations of its own forces. Goldstone commended Israel for responding to his report by revising military procedures e.g. to discontinue the use of white phosphorus (including as a smokescreen) in or near civilian areas.[209]

again, you can try to pretend he didn't say that, or that he wasn't being truthful. that's your biased view.

Here's some other facts provided by israel"

The main arguments in the analysis were the following.

1. The resolution mandating the mission was one-sided and prejudicial and the terms of the mandate were never changed.
2. The composition of the Mission and its conduct raised serious questions about its impartiality.
3. Incidents selected for examination were cherry-picked for political effect.
4. The mission displayed double standards in acceptance of evidence: treating even photographic evidence presented by Israel as inherently untrustworthy, except when it could be used to condemn Israel, while uncritically accepting statements by Hamas; reinterpreting or dismissing self-incriminating statements by Hamas; and selectively quoting material from sources.
5. The report includes misstatements of fact: for example, it stated that Israel discriminated against its non-Jewish citizens in providing shelter from Palestinian rocket attacks, when the shelter was provided on the basis of proximity to the Gaza Strip and did not discriminate between Jews and non-Jews.
6. The report contains misstatements of law: for example, its description of the Israeli appeals process is outdated.
7. The report fails to consider the military complexities of the war, makes judgments lacking necessary knowledge, and ignores Israel's extensive efforts to maintain humanitarian standards and protect civilians.
8. The report unjustifiably minimizes the threat of terrorism and in effect vindicates terrorist tactics.
9. The report presents its findings as judicial determinations of guilt, despite its admission that it does not reach a judicial level of proof; it commits egregious legal errors, including unjustifiable assumptions regarding intent and commanders' states of mind, as well as misinterpretation of the willfulness requirement of responsibility under international law.
10. The report ignores Israel's own investigations into its conduct, overlooks the many independent levels of scrutiny in Israel's judicial system, misrepresents Israel's legal mechanisms and shows disdain for democratic values.
11. The report makes one-sided recommendations against Israel while making only token recommendations with respect to Palestinians: for example, recommending Israel compensate Palestinians for attacks without recommending Palestinians compensate Israelis for attacks.

The analysis concludes that the report claims to represent international law but perverts it to serve a political agenda; that it sends a "legally unfounded message to states everywhere confronting terrorism that international law has no effective response to offer them", and that it signals to terrorist groups "that the cynical tactics of seeking to exploit civilian suffering for political ends actually pays dividends".[82]
​

again, you try to suggest the goldstone report proves israel targeted civilians, which again is part of the problem with the report. as noted above. people like you of course used it for your agenda though.

 

[cincymma79]

 

[Hellowhosthat]

All of the videos of the protests that I am seeing from all over the world would suggest otherwise.

I don't think there's exactly the majority of the population protesting lol.

 

[BIKES!]

No shit. Anyone who watches msm for more than 20 minutes can see this.
western propaganda is in full effect.

You forgot to end with your free Hamas flag.

 

[BIKES!]

Religion of terror getting back where the Nazi’s left off. Only group on earth that can get away with this. History repeats itself with inherently racist and demoralized children shutting their eyes

 

[BIKES!]

Ahh how history isn’t kind to terrorists

 

[kflo]

No shit. Anyone who watches msm for more than 20 minutes can see this.
western propaganda is in full effect.

yet somehow hamas has you carrying their water......

 

[BIKES!]

 

[SRN]

Religion of terror getting back where the Nazi’s left off. Only group on earth that can get away with this. History repeats itself with inherently racist and demoralized children shutting their eyes

Yeah I saw that last night and was disgusted. I'm surprised we didn't see Khamzat there.

 

[BIKES!]

Let’s just bury the Truth an follow Hitler’s footsteps. Why not just paint them as the devil and ignore reality

 

[BIKES!]

None of the terrorist sympathizers in this thread will watch real videos and speeches from actual Palestinians like this. Those actually close to the conflict

 

[BIKES!]

More facts none of the sheep will listen to. As if Israel is the reason Palestinians are suffering…

 

[Bagatur]

Religion of terror getting back where the Nazi’s left off. Only group on earth that can get away with this. History repeats itself with inherently racist and demoralized children shutting their eyes

lol at calling them tigers. tigers dont run in packs. more like hyenas.

 

[sangreporsangre]

 

[SammyPops]

You forgot to end with your free Hamas flag.

perfect post. Even though I've stated dozens of times that ithink hamas needs to be wiped out, any pro-Palestinain post is met with such accusations.

Mods should give you yellows for this BS.

 

[SammyPops]

yet somehow hamas has you carrying their water......

I am carrying water for a group that I think should either be killed in the war or exacuted after war if captured alive after a trial?

True believers like you are scary humans. You would make a great Maoist or Statlinist.