- Joined
- Mar 21, 2016
- Messages
- 1,690
- Reaction score
- 2,406
Probably sure a good number of posters would repeat this lies. You know the ones that don't see palestinians as humans
Are you really going to rehash these worn out talking points?
Yes Israel faced more human rights violations than such pillars of the world like China, Russia, Yemen, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, etc etc etc....
Could it be because UN has 58 Muslim majority nations and they see it as their religious duty to support their 'brothers'?
Could it be because many in the Western world have become little more than useful idiots?
They were built on slave labor. You should read about what the ruling class Emiratis do to the Instagram models and influencers who get flown over there, all expenses paid.
I can't wait for the oil reserves to go dry so I can see these idiots go from driving Bentleys to riding camels again. Aside from oil, I can't think of anything of substance these countries have contributed to the world.
If only you would speak what's really on your mind, those dubs would be a ban. Then I wouldn't mind counting how many times you blathered racist fantasy nonsense.I’m on a flight with trash wifi, sue me. The guy knows who it’s for.
You should hear about this other country. It was also built on slave labour and you should read what the elites do on a private island to minors. ..... who also got flown there.... I doubt they got paid as well as the insta models tho....
yes, leaders are responsible for the actions of their soldiers/employees, same as any company or government. You need proper oversight and instructions.I was the same when I first heard of the attack because the initial reports I saw talking about the military targets they went after. Then the horrors that occurred at the Kibbutzim were reported.
Idk that they ordered their fighters to commit atrocities but I do think it was a logical consequence of the orders. You can't order fighters to enter civilian areas to kidnap people and not expect that civilians will die. Not to mention the ideology of the group dehumanizes the other so in an ethnic conflict like this such atrocities are common if there isn't a high level of discipline among the troops which clearly Hamas does not have.
I don't say this to defend them because whether or not it was ordered doesn't change the fact that leaders are responsible for the actions of their troops. IIRC at least one Japanese general who condemned and forbid atrocities against civilians was hung after the war because his troops committed those atrocities despite his orders.
Tasmania dime….Nah . We probably have far more Instagram models than people who are that " elite " It's more a export than import business model here .
Although I'm sure some Australian " global elite " got the invites and went. There's just very few Australians who matter globally.
Just dark humour mate heh. On a side note we were to cheap to even buy slaves . Hence convicts hah.
On a side note we're getting back our roots tho
The extraordinary case of the Queensland councillor seeking re-election while fighting a murder charge
Sadly the tribes there experienced genocide and ethnic cleansing to bring it back to terms debated itt .Tasmania dime….
Way too deep a reply!! Was just a joke!Sadly the tribes there experienced genocide and ethnic cleansing to bring it back to terms debated itt .
Although. It was open warfare at the time which changes it for some. Depending how you use the words.
Our history is dark like all . But Tasmania's ls exceptionally dark by Australian standards imo
based on what I can find, it started as an Israeli phrase about sovereignty, and I think it implies a one-state solution. Then the PLO adopted a semi-ethnic cleaning counter protest version for their one state solution (depends on when you were born in the area, new arrivals would be removed somehow). Then Likud adopted it in the 1970s and Netanyahu also recently adopted to also mean a one state solution.Exposing "From the River to the Sea" hypocrisy:
based on what I can find, it started as an Israeli phrase about sovereignty, and I think it implies a one-state solution. Then the PLO adopted a semi-ethnic cleaning counter protest version for their one state solution (depends on when you were born in the area, new arrivals would be removed somehow). Then Likud adopted it in the 1970s and Netanyahu also recently adopted to also mean a one state solution.
It's ambiguous how a one state solution will be achieved without bloodshed. Similarly, 'from the river to the sea Palestine will be free' is also ambiguous.
Where the sinisterness comes from is from the time of the 1st intifada in the late 80's, early 90s. That's where the genocide part came - 'from water to water Palestine will be Arab/Muslim'.
Given the ambiguity of the statement and how it is used, probably best it is retired.
"
Palestinian gunmen, not Israeli forces, behind Gaza aid convoy deaths, IDF finds
Army says incident under investigation, with preliminary findings indicating Israeli forces did not fire upon Gazans gathered near aid trucks entering Gaza City
Yoav Zitun | published: 05:09
The IDF on Friday denied allegations by Hamas that Israeli forces had fired on civilians awaiting aid in Gaza City, saying that soldiers had not used their weapons at any stage of the incident and pointed to Palestinian gunmen as the cause of the casualties.
stories:
The incident took place late on Thursday after the military allowed 31 aid trucks to pass into the Gaza Strip heading toward Gaza City in the territory's north. According to unverified Palestinian reports, at least 40 people waiting for the convoy have been killed in the incident.
3 View gallery
עזתים מתנפלים על משאיות הסיוע ברצועה
Palestinians gathering near aid trucks in Gaza (Photo: REUTERS/Kosay Al Nemer)
Gaza’s Hamas-controlled health ministry reported at least 21 dead and over 100 injured in the incident.
According to the IDF, Palestinian gunmen, who had arrived at the site earlier, opened fire on the crowd that approached the convoy, aiming to prevent them from looting and gathering near the trucks, resulting in fatalities.
“Approximately one hour before the arrival of the convoy to the humanitarian corridor, armed Palestinians opened fire while Gazan civilians were awaiting the arrival of the aid convoy. As aid trucks were entering, the Palestinian gunmen continued to shoot as the crowd of Gazans began looting the trucks. Additionally, a number of Gazan civilians were run over by the trucks,” the military’s statement read.
The IDF added that an investigation into the incident is currently underway, and said initial reports confirmed military forces in the area didn’t open fire against the crowding Palestinians at any stage.
עזתים מתנפלים על משאיות ברחוב א-ראשיד שברצועת עזה
Gazans crowding near aid truck in the Strip (Photo: Reuters)
“A review of our operational systems and IDF forces on the ground found that no tank fire, air-strike or gunfire was carried out toward the Gazan civilians at the aid convoy.”
The military emphasized its efforts to continue and support the facilitation of providing humanitarian aid throughout the Strip.
“Hamas terrorists continue to harm Gazan civilians who are seeking food – and Hamas is blaming Israel for it. As a result, on the first Friday of the month of Ramadan, a smear campaign was created with the aim of spreading baseless misinformation for the sake of instigating violence in other arenas,” the military said.
מפגן צבאי בעזה
Hamas terrorists in Gaza (Photo: EPA)
As tensions in Israel rise at the start of the Ramadan month, Hamas holds a great interest in escalating and inciting violence against Jews and Israelis by Palestinians in the West Bank.
This incident isn’t the first time the Gaza-based terror group attempted to blame Israel for the result of tragic deaths of Gazans in the Strip, as back in February it attempted to do the same in a similar incident in which over 100 people were killed in a largescale stampede near Gaza City.
Palestinian accounts and Hamas terrorists claimed at the time IDF soldiers opened fire against the crowd who attempted to reach the aid trucks, with the military later providing a detailed report showing its investigation found no soldier in the area opened fire in the incident."