- Joined
- Oct 24, 2006
- Messages
- 18,290
- Reaction score
- 4,185
Bullshit. I'm gonna need proof of this.
Well for starters...
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/he...s-no-different-from-abortion-experts-say.html
Bullshit. I'm gonna need proof of this.
sigh... I get particularly annoyed when people try to obfuscate the abortion debate by focusing on late term abortions. It's such an obvious tactic, but people fall for it anyway.
every once in a while i won't visit sherdog for a few months only to come back to see a post like this and be reminded how unbelievably retarded people are on this website. then leave for another few monthsWould you call the parts below "a car" simply based on it's potential to be one? A fetus is not a 'child' or a 'baby'.
Actually thats quite a persistent myth. Women get custody more often, yes, but that's because men don't ask for full custody that much. If you look at cases were both sides are asking for full custody, the male is in favor or it's even I think.
every once in a while i won't visit sherdog for a few months only to come back to see a post like this and be reminded how unbelievably retarded people are on this website. then leave for another few months
I like how pro-choicers ADMIT that it becomes a life in the womb, and yet they treat the early fetus as if it has no value.
At what point does the soul form?
That's where I draw the line.
And if the soul already exists prior to conception then at what point does that soul infiltrate the womb?
Lettuce be scientific about this shit, son.
We don't have souls. Sooooo are you saying it's cool to kill anyone at any point?
Got through 5 pages and then wrote basically a shorter version of this. Should have went to the bottom of the page.Some facts according to the CDC:
91.5% of abortions were performed at ≤13 weeks’ gestation; a smaller number of abortions (7.2%) were performed at 14–20 weeks’ gestation, and even fewer (1.3%) were performed at ≥21 weeks’ gestation.
My view is that it is a non-issue, as the fetus had the ability to become a human life at every stage, the probability increasing in development. Selecting a “cut off” point at any age before birth is a relatively arbitrary distinction.
It is also rather immaterial, as statistics show almost all abortions are performed early. Those performed late are generally for medical reasons.
I’m fine with a cut-off age to appease the anti-abortion crowd, provided there is a caveat to allow for abortions for medical reasons which includes fetal abnormalities. Logically, it doesn’t make sense to have a cut-off age, but I understand the visceral and emotional side of it is a different story.
I like how pro-choicers ADMIT that it becomes a life in the womb, and yet they treat the early fetus as if it has no value.
"...ADMIT that it becomes life in the womb..."
Lmao of course it does. That's how pregnancy works. Holy shit.
Anyway, I have zero issue with late-term abortion.
So you have zero issue with taking human life.
Glad our cards are on the table.