If that wasn’t a Robbery then I don’t know what is...Romero is the real champ

[2004 account]

Hahaha you guys have to use that crutch “missing weight” excuse


How about explaining how Robert won that fight?

Can you even make a case?

Let’s get our heads out of our asses, it was clear who the winner was. I understand you support your by but be honest haha

 

[brian]

Whittaker clearly won 3 rounds. Only 1 round for Yoel could've been a 10-8. It could've been a draw or a win for Robert, i don't see how you can give the win to Yoel.

 

[Milan]

This is all I got to say about the decision.

 

[stato]

It wasn't a tittle fight...
If the judges gave it to Romero he still wouldn't be the "real champ"

 

[JonesBones]

Whittaker had 3-2 and even if it was close, fuck romero's dumb ass for not making weight

The way Romero won his rounds were much more impressive.

 

[Weuylf]

It was a draw. Either that or Whittaker, Yoel didn't win, but he deserved a draw.

1 2 4 Robert
3 5 (10 -8 5 fifth round)

 

[BASSER911414]

Whittaker 1-2-4

 

[Echo_Bliss]

Also, Romero didn't qualify for a title shot because he missed weight.

God didn't want hm to win, so he shut him down twice.

 

[TheAmericanGazelle]

He didn't win three rounds, he won two. The only issue is if you give Romero a 10-8 in last round.

once again Shertards don't understand what a robbery is, a close fight is not a robbery FFS

It's really weird how people don't get this.

 

[TrainAllDay]

Romero just beat his ass. Wow.

 

[ThulsaDooom]

Whitaker outstruck him by a wide margin in the first two rounds and won a close fourth. Not a robbery at all.

 

[M3LDY]

Missed weight, milked a groin shot, 2x back of head elbow after being warned. Fight was a draw, but he has missed weight twice, can't hang a belt on a fattie

 

[dethmanrulz]

Romero won 2 rounds, neither of which was a 10-8 as they were not one sided rounds.

They were absolutely one-sided... but perhaps not enough for a 10-8. Hard to say.

 

[Boy God]

Who cares about the belt, I enjoyed watching Romero beat Whitakers ass

 

[7.62x39]

only casuals think more damage = win. Doesn't work that way in UFC. I'm not even a whittaker fan

 

[DaMachine]

Hahaha you guys have to use that crutch “missing weight” excuse


How about explaining how Robert won that fight?

Can you even make a case?

Let’s get our heads out of our asses, it was clear who the winner was. I understand you support your by but be honest haha

Looking at your join date you must be new to MMA. Learn how the scoring works buddy.

Whittaker won 3 rounds clearly. The only question is if there was a 10-8. So it's either a draw or a Whittaker win.

NOT a robbery.

 

[true_fan]

Whittaker 1-2-4

Sherdog had it 3-2

 

[Thaijitsu612]

He won two rounds one of which was 10-8

 

[knock_you_out]

Cheaters never prosper!!!

 

[alaskamma]

How can you win 3 rounds out of five , connect cleaner and heavier, almost finish your opponent numerous times and still lose?

I know people hate to hear the word robbery but folks, this is the closest thing to a robbery if I’ve ever seen one.


Are they judging a fight or what? Based on damage which should be the most important criteria and based on the the UFC’s own criteria, Romero won.


Let the old man have his belt !

First of all, you’re high as giraffe pussy if you think Romero won 3 rounds.
Secondly, you can’t be the “real champ” of a weight class you fail to make weight for 2 damn times in a row.